Former Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu has joined the Liberal Party caucus and will align with the government’s social policies despite her previously expressed socially conservative positions. The announcement came this week, shortly after Gladu formally declared her floor-crossing.

Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed Thursday that Gladu, known for her opposition to abortion and resistance to a broad Liberal ban on conversion therapy, will now vote in accordance with Liberal stances on social issues. Carney emphasized that the Liberal Party remains firmly committed to protecting women’s rights to choose, as well as safeguarding the rights of all Canadians to equality regardless of sexual orientation.

“She will vote with the government on any votes related to these issues and support Canadians’ full enjoyment of their Charter rights,” Carney told reporters, referencing Gladu’s upcoming role within the Liberal caucus.

Gladu previously served as a Conservative MP for over a decade, during which she publicly advocated for socially conservative policies, including calls to revisit abortion debates and oppose measures restricting conversion therapy practices. In a letter to her former Conservative colleagues announcing her switch, Gladu stated she intended to continue promoting her values within the framework of Liberal governance, particularly focusing on economic growth during a critical period for Canada’s future.

“All of you know what I stand for, and know that I will continue bringing these perspectives inside the government tent, particularly in growing a strong economy at this important moment for Canada’s future,” she wrote.

The development has ignited discussions within Liberal ranks, where some members have questioned why Carney accepted a politician with views at odds with core Liberal social policies. The issue coincides with the ongoing Liberal Party convention in Montreal, which began Thursday and will conclude on Saturday, drawing thousands of party members.

Gladu’s defection underscores the complexities of political realignment in Ottawa and raises questions about how the governing party balances ideological differences within its caucus while maintaining discipline on key social issues.