John Humphrys has expressed deep frustration over the repeated failures of national institutions to protect citizens, highlighting tragedies such as Aberfan, Hillsborough, Grenfell, and the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic. He criticizes the inadequate accountability measures that have followed these events, emphasizing that those in leadership positions often face minimal consequences for their roles in these disasters.

Humphrys’ sentiments resonate with a broader public disappointment in the lack of systemic change despite the profound loss, grief, and trauma caused. Some observers suggest that this perceived absence of accountability contributes to public apathy and a sense of helplessness. Unlike in France, where citizens have historically demonstrated strong civic engagement—sometimes through direct actions such as protests or barricades—many in England appear resigned to a passive acceptance of institutional failures.

One perspective attributes this difference to variations in how citizenship and civic responsibility are taught and perceived. In France, education includes a strong emphasis on citizenship, instilling a sense of ownership and duty toward the nation from an early age. In contrast, England’s system is viewed by some as fostering a more hierarchical and controlled political environment, where people experience fewer guaranteed rights and greater restrictions imposed by those in power.

Critics argue that without fundamental reforms—such as replacing the monarchy’s influence and establishing a written constitution affirming the sovereignty of the people—these feelings of disempowerment and disengagement are likely to persist. They contend that the prevailing structure reinforces a dynamic where “they” in authority set the rules while “we” follow them, limiting opportunities for meaningful civic participation and sustained accountability in governance.