Advocates are urging the continued support and preservation of terrestrial television broadcasting amid ongoing discussions about shifting fully to online-based television services. Supporters emphasize that maintaining free-to-air terrestrial TV is essential for ensuring universal access, particularly for groups who may face barriers to internet connectivity.

Dennis Reed, a campaigner for terrestrial television, argues that discontinuing terrestrial broadcast would disproportionately affect those without affordable broadband, reliable internet service, or the skills and confidence to use digital platforms. Reed highlights that preserving terrestrial TV enables older individuals and vulnerable populations to continue accessing free television without incurring broadband costs. He notes that charities backing terrestrial television share this position, emphasizing the importance of a service accessible to all regardless of internet access. According to Reed, public opinion consistently favors retaining terrestrial TV, citing a petition by the Silver Voices organization that has gathered over 150,000 signatures in support.

Reed advocates for a hybrid broadcasting future where both terrestrial and online services coexist through the 2040s. Such an approach would allow viewers to transition to online platforms as their circumstances allow, while maintaining a simple, universal broadcast system for those who need it.

Echoing these concerns, David Romeo of Nottingham underscores the practical benefits of terrestrial television as a resilient alternative during internet disruptions. He recounts experiencing three broadband outages, one affecting his entire region, during which he was able to continue watching terrestrial TV without interruption. Romeo warns that broadband networks are susceptible to sabotage or cyberattacks, implying that terrestrial broadcasting should remain available as an emergency communication channel for governments to reach the public in times of crisis.

Both Reed and Romeo’s perspectives reflect a cautious stance on the complete shutdown of terrestrial television services, highlighting issues of accessibility, reliability, and national security. Their arguments contribute to an ongoing debate over how best to balance technological advancement with inclusivity and resilience in broadcast media.