Mohamed Al Fayed’s widow and executor, Heini Wathen-Fayed, has challenged the legitimacy and scale of sexual abuse claims against the late former Harrods owner, asserting that the allegations are untrue and opposing any settlements with claimants. This position emerged during a High Court hearing last week, revealing the estate’s stance amid ongoing legal proceedings.

The estate faces claims totaling approximately £150 million, brought by around 270 individuals alleging sexual abuse by Al Fayed. These claims include accusations from former Harrods employees as well as personal staff such as nannies, private assistants, and air stewards. The allegations gained significant public attention following a BBC documentary and subsequent investigations, prompting the establishment of a redress scheme by Harrods for former employees who report abuse.

Heini Wathen-Fayed, a Finnish socialite and former model who married Al Fayed in 1985, serves as one of the executors of the estate alongside her daughters Camilla and Jasmine Fayed. In correspondence submitted earlier this year, her legal team described the claims as “inflated” and suggested that they face substantial legal and evidential challenges that would be difficult to overcome. Wathen-Fayed herself reportedly “does not believe that any of the allegations against the deceased are true” and indicated she would not support any settlement.

The estate, believed to be valued at around £1 billion, contends that the maximum credible payout related to personal injury claims would represent only a fraction of the £150 million figure claimed by the legal firm representing the alleged victims. Lawyers for the estate emphasized that, while the allegations are taken seriously, the matter remains subject to legal processes, limiting publicly available commentary.

Harrods, however, has expressed concern over the current executors' management of the claims, arguing that they are unsuitable to handle the compensation arrangements amid the ongoing litigation. The company warned that the estate risks financial strain if it has to cover these claims without access to additional funds and criticized the estate for lacking acknowledgment or apology toward survivors.

“From last week’s hearing and court documents, it is clear the Fayed estate intends to focus on a limitation defense and disputes the estimates of claim values,” a Harrods spokesperson said. “We do not intend to comment further at this stage, but our thoughts remain with those affected by these allegations.”

The legal firm Fladgate, representing the estate, was contacted for comment but did not immediately respond. The case continues as the High Court evaluates the management of the estate and the validity of the claims.