AMENDMENT 2 • SENATE BILL 1080

A 3.5% ceiling on the state income tax

On the ballot: “Constitutional amendment to keep the State income tax rate from being raised higher than three and one-half percent (3.5%).”

What is true today

The constitution today caps the state income tax rate at 7% - a ceiling voters lowered from 10% in 2018. The actual flat individual rate is set by ordinary law, not by this amendment: it is 3.99% in 2026 and is already scheduled under current law to fall to 3.49% in 2027 and lower in later years (2.99% in 2028 in the enacted schedule, with further trigger-based cuts possible). If approved, the 3.5% ceiling would apply to tax years beginning January 1, 2027.

This is the only one of the three amendments that restricts a tax to a specific percentage: 3.5%. It is a maximum, not a promise of what anyone will pay, and it concerns the state income tax - it does not by itself set sales, corporate, or property taxes.

A FOR vote means you support lowering the constitutional maximum from 7% to 3.5%, so no future legislature could raise the rate above 3.5% without another constitutional amendment approved by voters.

An AGAINST vote means the ceiling stays at 7%. The scheduled statutory rate cuts still happen; lawmakers keep the option to set a rate anywhere up to 7% by ordinary law.

Supporters argue

Taxpayer protection: voters, not just legislators, should have to approve any move back to higher income taxes.

Predictability and competitiveness: a low, durable ceiling helps families and businesses plan, and supporters credit more than a decade of rate cuts for North Carolina’s strong rankings as a place to do business.

It locks in progress: the rate is already heading below 3.5%, so the amendment preserves that direction.

Discipline: a cap encourages the state to live within a known revenue limit and control spending growth.

Critics argue

No immediate tax cut: the amendment does not lower this year’s bill; the rate is already scheduled to fall below the cap without it.

Less room in a downturn or disaster: a future legislature facing a recession, hurricane recovery, or rising costs could not raise income tax above 3.5% even temporarily, without a statewide vote.

Schools and services: income tax provides about half of the state General Fund; critics, including the governor and education groups, warn a hard ceiling could force cuts or deficits over time.

Shift, not saving: if income tax is capped, pressure may move to sales taxes, fees, or local taxes, which critics say fall more heavily on lower-income households. A flat-rate cap also benefits higher earners most in dollar terms, critics add.

Immediate effect: a future ceiling, not a cut. Your 2026 rate stays 3.99% either way, and the drop to 3.49% in 2027 is already in law. What changes is the highest rate any future legislature may choose - 3.5% instead of 7%.

Question to consider: Do you want today’s low-rate direction made permanent, or do you want future elected officials - who will face circumstances no one can foresee - to keep the wider range the constitution allows today?