Andy Burnham has faced criticism for perceived reluctance to make difficult policy decisions during his first six weeks as Prime Minister. Having succeeded Sir Keir Starmer in mid-2026, Burnham has introduced several popular initiatives, including measures to reduce energy costs by ending VAT on household bills, a pledge to end rough sleeping by Christmas, a £2 cap on bus fares, and business rate reductions for pubs. However, commentators note that substantial reforms, particularly on defence, welfare, and immigration, remain largely unaddressed.

On the subject of defence, Burnham’s government has reaffirmed support for Ukraine, with the Prime Minister recently visiting Kyiv to express solidarity and promising to share technology for missile development. Despite this show of support, the government has not committed to raising military spending to 3 percent of GDP by 2030, a target many NATO allies are pursuing. Chancellor John Healey, who resigned as Defence Secretary earlier over the failure to commit to this benchmark, acknowledged that defence spending increases remain uncertain. A pathway to the 3 percent target is expected to be detailed in next year’s spending review rather than the upcoming October budget. Critics argue that this deferral undermines national security at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions.

Welfare reform also faces delays. The welfare budget, which accounts for approximately £334 billion annually—about a quarter of government expenditure—continues to rise amid national debt nearing £3 trillion. Burnham’s administration has postponed significant changes, opting instead for two ongoing reviews on welfare payments led by senior officials. This cautious approach reflects tensions within Labour, with backbench MPs resisting cuts to benefits that have broad public support. Analysts contend that the government’s reluctance to take decisive action could exacerbate fiscal pressures.

Immigration remains another contentious area. Recent Home Office data indicate a record number of immigrants granted indefinite leave to remain in the year leading up to June 2026, a legacy of previous Conservative policies. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has proposed extending residency requirements for permanent settlement from five to ten years, with even longer periods for certain groups. However, these proposals face internal opposition within Labour, notably from Deputy Leader Angela Rayner, who has described such measures as uncharacteristic of the party. This internal discord has contributed to policy uncertainty on immigration.

Burnham’s leadership style has drawn contrasting views. Supporters highlight his personable, approachable demeanor and focus on popular policies, such as local government devolution and measures intended to support working families. Critics, however, characterize him as avoiding tough decisions and relying on consultations and reviews to delay action on pressing issues. Some observers compare his tenure to that of his predecessor, noting continuity in hesitancy on major reforms despite Burnham’s campaign promise to offer a more decisive alternative.

As parliamentary activity resumes following the summer recess, Burnham faces increasing pressure to articulate clear positions on major policy challenges, including defence funding, welfare reform, and immigration controls. His upcoming exchanges with parliamentary opponents are expected to test whether his administration can move beyond cautious incrementalism to substantive policy change.