Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has issued an apology following remarks made during a podcast interview in which he discussed his attraction to singer Kylie Minogue using explicit language. The comments, which drew criticism from political figures across the spectrum, have sparked debate about the appropriateness of the prime minister’s conduct.

The remarks occurred during an appearance on the Bush Deep podcast, hosted by comedian Nikki Osborne. Albanese was asked to participate in a “shag, marry, date” game involving three Australian celebrities: Kylie Minogue, Nicole Kidman, and Rhonda Burchmore. Initially, Albanese declined to play along, noting that he had been married for just six months. However, when Osborne pressed him to respond “if it goes tits up,” the prime minister answered that Kylie Minogue was his choice, stating “all of the above” when asked if he would marry, date, or “shag” her, further describing Minogue as “terrific.”

The prime minister’s office issued a brief statement apologizing for the remarks, with Albanese expressing unequivocal regret. The comments have drawn criticism from several politicians. Zali Steggall, an independent member of parliament, described the remarks as “entirely inappropriate,” saying Albanese should demonstrate better judgment and lead by example in rejecting sexist attitudes. Liberal Senator Sarah Henderson called the comments “disrespectful to women” and said they demeaned the office of the prime minister. Former deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce stated that, while the prime minister may have “fallen into a trap,” it was one a leader should avoid, emphasizing that comments of this nature could erode public respect.

In addition to the discussion about Minogue, Albanese briefly touched on his personal life during the podcast, noting that his marital intimacy depends on having time and that a win by his rugby team, the South Sydney Rabbitohs, serves as an aphrodisiac. Albanese and his wife, Jodie Haydon, married in November 2025.

The incident has reignited conversations about expected standards of conduct for public officials and the boundaries of casual conversation in public forums. While supporters have noted the informal context of the interview, critics assert that such remarks from a national leader are inappropriate and undermine the dignity of the office. The prime minister’s apology underscores the sensitivity surrounding public discourse on issues of respect and professionalism.