With Israel’s general election scheduled for October 27, there is growing public and political interest in a televised debate between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, who is now leading the Yisahar party. Eisenkot has formally invited Netanyahu to participate, offering the prime minister the option to select the broadcast channel and debate format.
Public support for such a debate appears strong. A recent Kan 11 poll showed that 54% of respondents favor a direct exchange between the two candidates. Notably, 38% of prospective Likud voters and 80% of anticipated Yisahar supporters expressed support for the debate. Advocates argue that a face-to-face discussion ahead of the vote would provide Israeli citizens with an opportunity to hear the candidates’ positions on critical issues and assess their leadership firsthand.
The debate, proponents say, is particularly important given the context of recent events and election themes. Both Netanyahu and Eisenkot are seeking the confidence of voters to lead Israel through complex security challenges and ongoing socio-economic concerns. Netanyahu, having served multiple terms as prime minister, is expected to defend his record, including his government’s preparedness and response to the Hamas attack on October 7. Eisenkot, whose military career and role in the wartime cabinet are central to his campaign, is called upon to clarify how his experience would influence his approach to national security.
Among the pressing topics suggested for discussion are the strategies each candidate would pursue to prevent the resurgence of militant groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, confront Iran’s regional threats, and maintain Israel’s strategic alliance with the United States. They are also expected to outline plans to address military service policies, especially regarding enlistment rates among the ultra-Orthodox population, and clarify how security forces would be supported moving forward.
Economic issues, including the rising cost of living, taxation, government spending, and funding priorities, are also slated to be key points of inquiry. Given the intensive competition for budgetary resources, voters seek clarity on how the candidates plan to balance defense needs with domestic welfare and reconstruction efforts in areas affected by recent violence.
In addition to security and economic policies, debate organizers and observers emphasize the importance of transparency regarding coalition-building efforts following the vote. Both Netanyahu and Eisenkot have acknowledged the complexities of forming a governing majority in the 120-seat Knesset, where securing at least 61 seats is necessary to govern. The candidates are expected to clarify which political partners they would court, the concessions they are willing to make, and how they plan to reconcile differing party agendas.
Calls have been made to establish a clear date and format for the debate, proposing independent moderators, equal speaking time, and pre-set topics to ensure substantive discussion. It is suggested that moderators should enforce direct responses and discourage candidates from evading questions through attacks or deflections. Ensuring the event is recorded and accessible for public viewing is also recommended to maximize transparency.
While other party leaders are likely to face scrutiny in similar formats, a debate between Netanyahu and Eisenkot is viewed as a critical starting point. Such an engagement could provide voters with insight into each candidate’s preparedness and policy priorities, helping inform the electorate before they cast their ballots.
As the election draws near, observers and many citizens are urging Netanyahu to accept Eisenkot’s invitation, emphasizing the electorate’s right to hear detailed explanations of leadership visions from the two central contenders.