Shabir Ahmed, the 73-year-old ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang, is set to be released from prison today, stirring renewed calls for his deportation. Ahmed was convicted in 2012 for multiple counts of rape and sexual offenses against underage girls. Despite the serious nature of his crimes, current legal provisions prevent his deportation.

The restrictions stem from the 1971 Immigration Act, which currently blocks Ahmed’s removal from the country. This has prompted calls for a review of existing laws to prevent similar outcomes in the future.

Andy Burnham, a prominent political figure, expressed strong opposition to Ahmed remaining in the country. Burnham stated on social media platform X that he intends to urge the Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary to explore all available measures to facilitate Ahmed’s deportation. “I want this vile criminal out of the country. Victims must come first,” Burnham said, adding that “nothing is off the table” in seeking a resolution.

The case of Shabir Ahmed highlights ongoing debates around immigration law and criminal justice, particularly regarding individuals convicted of serious offenses. Advocates for stricter deportation measures argue that offenders like Ahmed should not be allowed to remain in the country after serving their sentences. Conversely, some legal experts caution that immigration laws and human rights considerations complicate these efforts.

As Ahmed prepares for release, authorities and policymakers face mounting pressure to address the apparent gaps in current legislation and to respond to public concern over the protection of victims and community safety.