Channel 4’s upcoming documentary, *The Great ADHD Myth?*, has stirred controversy ahead of its scheduled broadcast later this month. Hosted by Dr. Max Pemberton, the program examines whether attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a legitimate medical condition or primarily a social construct.

The documentary’s premise has drawn criticism from some quarters, including writer Matt Haig, who disclosed that he was diagnosed with ADHD and autism later in life. Haig voiced his concerns on social media, arguing that the documentary’s title contributes to the stigma surrounding ADHD. He described ADHD as “biological reality” and expressed worry that the programme could worsen public misunderstanding of the disorder.

The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) also responded following a promotional announcement that included a quote from Dr. Iona Heath, a former president of the RCGP, suggesting that ADHD is “not a medical condition.” The RCGP clarified that the remarks attributed to Dr. Heath did not represent the official position of the college. The organization affirmed its recognition of ADHD as a neurodevelopmental disorder and reiterated its support for evidence-based care aligned with current national guidelines.

The disagreement reflects ongoing debates around ADHD’s definition and diagnosis. Supporters of the documentary’s approach argue that exploring the social and cultural factors influencing ADHD diagnosis is important, while critics emphasize the biological and medical foundation of the disorder and caution against narratives that might undermine its validity.

*The Great ADHD Myth?* is set to premiere on Channel 4 later this month, continuing discussions about how ADHD is understood and treated in contemporary society.