A new Sky Documentaries series titled *Katie Price: Nothing To Hide* explores the turbulent life of the British media personality, charting her journey from early fame as a model in the 1990s to her current public struggles. The four-part series, released in 2026, offers an intimate, often stark portrayal of Price’s experiences, focusing heavily on her personal relationships and numerous cosmetic procedures.
The documentary opens with scenes depicting Price at home with her cat, setting a tone of vulnerability that contrasts sharply with her earlier public image. Throughout the series, filmmakers delve into various phases of her life, highlighting her marriages and high-profile romances, including her relationships with figures such as Peter Andre and Alex Reid. The narrative progressively shifts toward darker themes as Price confronts the consequences of her past decisions.
To provide context, the production includes interviews with people close to Price, such as singer Kerry Katona, Michelle Heaton, and Dane Bowers, as well as Price’s first cosmetic surgeon, Doctor Jeya Prakash. These voices aim to shed light on her life and the challenges she has faced. However, critics of the series suggest that despite these efforts, the documentary struggles to transcend the chaotic and often self-destructive patterns that have characterized much of Price’s public life, leaving some viewers finding it difficult to engage with the material beyond a sense of discomfort.
In a separate broadcast, Channel 4 aired *How To Get Filthy Rich*, a program centered on Gary Stevenson, a former city trader turned YouTuber who advocates for a two percent annual wealth tax on individuals with assets exceeding £10 million. Stevenson argues this tax would address economic inequality, though critics contend the policy risks encouraging wealthy individuals to leave the country, potentially resulting in significant tax revenue losses. This concern references similar outcomes in other nations, such as France’s abandonment of its wealth tax in 2018 amid capital flight.
The program faced criticism for its editorial choices, including how supporters and opponents of Stevenson’s proposal were presented. Detractors noted that opponents were often accompanied by ominous background music, while proponents were portrayed more sympathetically, raising questions about the program’s impartiality. Among the featured voices was Sir Dan Moynihan, Stevenson’s former headmaster, who spoke passionately about wealth redistribution despite earning a substantial salary himself.
Stevenson repeatedly emphasized the need for a form of taxation that the super-rich cannot circumvent, though he did not provide specific methods for implementing such measures. Critics questioned the practicality of his ideas, pointing out that the wealthiest already contribute a significant share of income tax in the United Kingdom.
Together, these two broadcasts illustrate ongoing debates within British society surrounding fame, personal accountability, and economic inequality, each presenting different facets of contemporary public discourse.