David Sullivan, co-owner and largest shareholder of West Ham United, attended the club’s opening home match of the season against Portsmouth at the London Stadium on August 8, despite advice to stay away amid ongoing allegations of sexual misconduct. Sullivan, 77, had been urged to avoid the fixture by both the stadium’s operators and West Ham’s fans advisory board due to concerns over potential fan unrest, but he took his usual seat without drawing notable attention.

Sullivan resigned as co-chair of West Ham in June following the publication of a joint investigation that brought to light serious historical allegations against him. The investigation included claims from seven women accusing Sullivan of abusing his position to exploit them sexually during the 1980s, when they were young models seeking work with his then-print publications. Sullivan categorically denies these allegations. To date, eight women have reported concerns about his behaviour to the police, but no charges have been filed.

The club and stadium authorities acknowledged they were unaware that Sullivan had been banned from contact with West Ham’s youth and women’s teams for safeguarding reasons over the past three years. In spite of the controversy, Sullivan remains West Ham’s largest individual shareholder, holding a 38.8 percent stake. Reports indicate he is open to selling his shares, potentially to a consortium led by Amanda Staveley, which recently agreed to purchase a 25.1 percent stake from the family of former co-owner David Gold, or possibly to West Ham’s second-largest shareholder, Daniel Kretinsky.

On the field, West Ham overcame a first-half deficit to secure a win in the Carabao Cup first-round match. Portsmouth took an early lead through a goal by Adrian Segecic, but West Ham rallied with two goals from Taty Castellanos and a deflected strike from Jarrod Bowen to progress to the second round. Head coach Nuno Espírito Santo commented that the team remained focused despite the external distractions, emphasizing the need to concentrate on their performance regardless of surrounding controversy.

Sullivan’s presence at the match passed with relatively little fan reaction, a contrast to the hostility he faced when supporters heckled him during West Ham’s relegation from the Premier League earlier in the year. He was seated alongside a man described as a guest, rather than security, according to the club. The situation highlights ongoing tensions within the club and among its supporters as West Ham navigates both sporting challenges and off-field controversies.