Tyler Robinson, charged with the aggravated murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, reportedly expressed regret for the killing to his former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, a day after the shooting, according to court testimony and evidence presented during a preliminary hearing in Utah.
Robinson is accused of shooting Kirk in the neck on September 10, 2025, while Kirk was addressing a crowd at Utah Valley University. Kirk, known as a close ally of former U.S. President Donald Trump and a prominent conservative figure, was taken to a hospital where he was pronounced dead. The suspected murder weapon, a bolt-action rifle believed to belong to Robinson’s grandfather, was recovered wrapped in a towel near the shooting site.
During the hearing on July 9, prosecutors played a partially redacted video interview with Lance Twiggs, who discussed conversations and text exchanges with Robinson in the aftermath of the shooting. Twiggs testified that Robinson returned to their shared townhouse in St. George, Utah, the morning after the killing. When confronted, Robinson allegedly admitted to the shooting and expressed remorse, stating he “wished he hadn’t done it.” Twiggs provided the interview under immunity, meaning his statements cannot be used against him in any potential charges.
Prosecutors also introduced text messages and a handwritten note allegedly from Robinson to Twiggs, in which Robinson purportedly acknowledged targeting Kirk due to his political views. One message reportedly stated, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it,” while another said, “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.” These communications were presented as evidence of premeditation and motive.
Robinson’s defense team has not entered a plea and has sought to remove the death penalty as a potential sentence, without success so far. They have also questioned the thoroughness of the police investigation and suggested alternative possibilities regarding the perpetrator. Defense lawyers objected to the public release of certain statements and evidence, arguing it could prejudice Robinson’s right to a fair trial. The presiding judge, Tony Graf, allowed some evidence to be shown but imposed limits to protect both parties’ rights.
The preliminary hearing, expected to last several days, is intended to determine if sufficient evidence exists for the case to proceed to trial. The courtroom has seen attendance from family members on both sides, including Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, and prominent Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee.
Lawyers for the Kirk family have argued for maximum transparency during the hearing, emphasizing the public interest in the case. Jeffrey Neiman, representing the family, stated that openness is essential to maintain trust in the justice system, especially given the high profile of the victim and the political implications. The judge acknowledged these concerns while balancing the need to safeguard due process.
The incident highlights escalating tensions around political violence in the United States and has drawn nationwide attention due to Kirk’s prominence and the circumstances of the attack. The court will decide in the coming days whether Robinson will stand trial on charges that include aggravated murder.