The Maryland Democratic primary to succeed retiring House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer has become a highly contested and financially intense race, marked by nearly $11 million in spending linked to cryptocurrency interests and pro-Israel groups. Hoyer’s departure after 45 years has sparked a crowded field of 24 candidates vying for the seat, with Delegate Adrian Boafo, Hoyer’s preferred successor and former campaign manager, emerging as a central figure of the contest.
Boafo, a young former local official and federal lobbyist for Oracle, began the campaign with limited name recognition but has been propelled by a surge of super PAC-funded advertisements. These ads, financed primarily by cryptocurrency-aligned Protect Progress and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) through its United Democracy Project (UDP) PAC, have focused on bolstering Boafo’s profile without explicitly mentioning cryptocurrency or Israel. Collectively, the outside spending has overwhelmed the primary race in Maryland’s 5th Congressional District, a seat considered safely Democratic in general elections.
The infusion of outside money has deepened divisions within the Maryland Democratic delegation. Senator Chris Van Hollen, a vocal critic of the Israeli government’s actions in Gaza and a prominent figure in the state's Democratic leadership, chose not to endorse a candidate but condemned the influx of external financing. He urged voters to be cautious of groups “trying to buy this congressional seat,” emphasizing that these organizations prioritize their own agendas over the district’s interests. Van Hollen also questioned whether Boafo had made commitments to donors from the cryptocurrency sector or AIPAC, a suggestion the delegate strongly denied, calling it “extremely insulting.”
Boafo maintains that while he supports the U.S.-Israel relationship and has urged protections for the cryptocurrency industry at the state level, he has been critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and denies any quid pro quo with special interests. He emphasized that voters at early-voting sites have been more concerned with economic issues than outside spending.
Opponents of Boafo, including former Prince George’s County Executive Rushern Baker, former Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn, businesswoman Quincy Bareebe, and Council member Wala Blegay, have voiced concerns about the significant financial backing Boafo enjoys from groups whose donor identities are not fully transparent. They argue that such spending represents an outsized influence of special interests and urge greater disclosure. Blegay, who has supported pro-Palestinian ceasefire resolutions, criticized the super PAC ads for pre-empting genuine voter deliberation.
Protect Progress has contributed over $5.5 million to Boafo’s campaign efforts, while AIPAC’s UDP PAC has spent more than $4 million, continuing a trend of heavy investment in Maryland Democratic primaries in recent cycles. AIPAC-affiliated support has also backed Reps. Glenn Ivey and Sarah Elfreth in previous contests. Dunn has labeled AIPAC-linked funding “a cancer,” reflecting concerns among some candidates and activists about the role of pro-Israel groups in Democratic primaries, especially amid heightened tensions following the Gaza war.
Defending their involvement, AIPAC representatives highlighted Boafo’s endorsements from gubernatorial candidate Wes Moore, Prince George’s County Executive Angela Alsobrooks, and Steny Hoyer himself. The group’s ads underscore these endorsements, including one featuring Hoyer affirming his trust in Boafo’s integrity and independence despite outside spending criticisms.
Progressive pro-Israel lobby J Street criticized AIPAC’s activities in the race as interfering with democratic processes and called for balanced leadership that advocates for both Palestinians and Israelis.
The sizable campaign contributions surrounding this race mirror a national trend where super PACs aligned with cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence, and pro-Israel interests have become major players in congressional primaries. Maryland is one of several states where the United Democracy Project has heavily invested in television advertising.
Congressman Jamie Raskin, also from Maryland, highlighted the growing influence of wealthy special interest groups in election financing. He suggested that the current landscape could allow a few affluent entities to effectively dictate outcomes in pivotal congressional races, underscoring calls from progressives for reform in campaign finance laws amid the influx of large-scale outside spending.
