Earl Spencer’s recently published memoir has reignited controversy surrounding the late Princess Diana and her family, drawing sharp criticism for its portrayal of King Charles. The book includes allegations that King Charles was “giddily elated” at Diana’s death in 1997 and claims he predicted that her memory would eventually be forgotten.

Earl Spencer, the princess’s brother, had previously earned widespread respect for his eulogy at Diana’s funeral, which was widely seen as a moving tribute during a moment of national mourning. With the passage of more than two decades, many in the United Kingdom had hoped the intense grief and public scrutiny surrounding Diana’s death would evolve into healing and reconciliation among her family members.

The memoir’s publication has prompted a response from Buckingham Palace, which suggested that “the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory,” indicating some understanding of Earl Spencer’s perspective while implicitly questioning the accuracy of his account. The palace also emphasized King Charles’s dedication both as a father and as a public servant, countering the memoir’s negative portrayal.

Public reaction has been mixed, with some expressing concern that Earl Spencer’s book may further strain relations within the royal family, particularly as efforts continue to reconcile King Charles with his sons, Prince William and Prince Harry. Observers note that the memoir’s accusations could complicate these delicate family dynamics rather than contribute to unity.

Calls have been made for Earl Spencer to exercise restraint and compassion in addressing family matters publicly, urging him to consider the long-term implications for both his own reputation and that of the royal family. The publication arrives amid ongoing public interest in the legacy of Princess Diana and the intricate relationships within the House of Windsor.