European leaders have voiced strong opposition to a proposal by former U.S. President Donald Trump to purchase Greenland, underscoring the principle that the island’s future is solely a matter for Denmark and Greenland to decide.

On January 6, leaders from France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and several other U.S. allies issued a joint statement emphasizing that Greenland “belongs to its people” and that decisions regarding the territory must be made exclusively by Denmark and Greenland. The statement also highlighted the increased presence and investments their countries have made in the Arctic to ensure regional security and deter potential adversaries.

The European leaders stressed that, as Denmark is a member of NATO, Arctic security should be managed collectively, in accordance with international law, specifically the United Nations Charter. This includes respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and inviolability of borders, they said.

Shortly after the joint statement, Trump responded with a tariff threat, suggesting he would impose a 10 percent duty on imports from certain European allies, including some signatories of the statement, until a “deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.” However, the former president soon retreated from this stance, saying he had worked with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte to outline a framework for a “future deal” regarding Greenland.

Despite officials’ attempts at negotiations, there remains significant resistance within Greenland itself. On the day Trump issued the tariff threat, protesters in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital, held demonstrations featuring Greenlandic flags and signs reading “Make America Go Away” and “We Are Not Property!” The public sentiment reflected concerns over foreign intervention and sovereignty.

Lars Vintner, a heating engineer from Greenland, voiced skepticism of the proposal. “I think he should mind his own business,” Vintner said in January. “What’s he going to do with Greenland? He speaks of Russians and Chinese and everything in Greenlandic waters or in our..."

The episode underscores ongoing tensions between the U.S. administration’s strategic interest in the Arctic and local and international calls for respecting established sovereignty and governance frameworks. With Greenland firmly rejecting outright sale discussions, it appears unlikely that any U.S. acquisition will proceed.