The Science desk at a major American newspaper is undergoing a significant expansion and restructuring under the leadership of its new department head, Bill Wasik. Appointed in April following the retirement of longtime chair Celia W. Dugger, Wasik—formerly editorial director of the newspaper’s Magazine section—has initiated a series of new columns, projects, and beats aimed at deepening the publication's science coverage.
This summer marks the rollout of four weekly columns by prominent science writers, including Pulitzer Prize-winning cosmic journalist Natalie Wolchover and nature writer David Quammen. Alongside these columns, the desk is relaunching its Science newsletter, which will deliver two emails per week featuring original reporting and analysis.
In addition, a special project titled “Unknowns” is slated for introduction later this fall. The initiative will focus on unsolved scientific problems across multiple disciplines, such as the mechanisms underlying black holes and the expansion of the universe. The project plans to incorporate visual explainers and animations to help readers engage with complex scientific mysteries.
Wasik’s appointment comes after an organizational consolidation in 2017 that brought all health coverage under the Science desk. While health and policy stories remain integral, recent hiring efforts have broadened the desk’s focus to include emerging scientific fields and global perspectives. New staff members include biotech reporter Carolyn Y. Johnson from The Washington Post; Zeyi Yang from Wired, who covers science developments in China; Cade Metz, spearheading the artificial intelligence beat; and Eric Boodman from STAT, who will serve as national science correspondent focusing on the human elements of scientific progress.
Although Wasik does not come from a traditional science background, he was a mathematics major and has a longstanding interest in science. He views his magazine editing experience as a strength, allowing him to emphasize the broader significance and context behind scientific advances. Wasik expressed a focus on ensuring coverage goes beyond individual studies or breakthroughs to explore larger trends and ideas shaping the future.
“The thing that most excites me about science coverage is ideas,” Wasik said. “Whether it’s a new pharmaceutical test or a development in AI, I ask not just, ‘What is the news?’ but ‘Why does the news matter?’” He aims to address a common critique from scientists that isolated reporting on specific results can overinflate their significance without adequate context.
As the Science desk adapts to these expanded ambitions, Wasik acknowledges a learning curve in transitioning from magazine editing to daily news. However, he is committed to leveraging his editorial instincts to bring complex scientific stories to a wider audience, blending innovation in coverage with careful attention to accuracy and relevance.
