In an unexpected development, former President Donald Trump has publicly embraced Michael D. Cohen, his one-time personal lawyer and fixer who previously testified against him in multiple legal proceedings. The rapprochement was highlighted last month during a radio broadcast, where Mr. Trump praised Mr. Cohen for “recanting” his testimony, a claim the former lawyer has not substantiated.

Mr. Trump reiterated on social media that Mr. Cohen had “fully RECANTED his testimony” against him and called for the dismissal of ongoing legal cases against him. However, Mr. Cohen has neither withdrawn nor repudiated his earlier sworn statements related to Mr. Trump’s hush-money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels or allegations of fraudulent business practices. Instead, Mr. Cohen has expressed that he “felt pressured and coerced” by prosecutors, though he maintains the truthfulness of his testimony.

This renewed association between the two men—who played pivotal roles in each other’s legal downfalls—is widely viewed as transactional rather than a reconciliation rooted in remorse or forgiveness. Sources close to both men suggest that Mr. Cohen seeks a presidential pardon to mitigate his own felony convictions, while Mr. Trump aims to leverage Mr. Cohen’s ambiguous stance to undermine legal actions against himself.

Mr. Cohen served as Mr. Trump’s lawyer and self-described “pit bull” for years, handling sensitive business and personal matters, including efforts to secure a Trump Tower deal in Moscow during the 2016 presidential campaign and orchestrating hush money payments. His cooperation with prosecutors contributed to Mr. Trump’s convictions on 34 felony counts, which have had significant legal and political consequences for the former president.

Following his conviction and imprisonment, Mr. Cohen became an outspoken critic of Mr. Trump, authoring two books sharply denouncing his former boss and publicly denigrating him with a series of harsh epithets. However, after Mr. Trump’s return to the presidency in 2025, Mr. Cohen’s tone shifted. Having been denied clemency by the Biden administration and alienated from anti-Trump circles, he reportedly sought reconciliation and resubmitted a presidential pardon request, this time to Mr. Trump.

The renewed alignment extended to media appearances, including a podcast hosted by Lara Trump and a radio show on a station owned by a Trump supporter. Despite this, Mr. Cohen maintained some engagement with political figures on the opposing side, creating confusion among former allies. Observers noted his apparent desire to reestablish connections with Mr. Trump while attempting to navigate a fractured political identity.

Mr. Cohen’s critics express skepticism about his motivations, attributing the shift to pragmatic survival amid a difficult public and professional fallout from his role in Mr. Trump’s legal troubles. Supporters note the risks he faces in implicating himself in perjury if he were to outright deny his testimony. In public statements, Mr. Cohen clarified that feeling “pressured and coerced” does not equate to a denial of the veracity of his statements, emphasizing a distinction between personal feelings and factual accuracy.

Analysts characterize the renewed rapport as emblematic of Mr. Trump’s broader pattern of reabsorbing former adversaries into his circle when it serves mutual interests. The delicate, transactional nature of this relationship underscores the complexities surrounding the intertwined legal and political futures of both men as Mr. Trump intensifies efforts to discredit the investigations and convictions he faces.