The government’s decision to ease tourism restrictions at St Martin’s Island has sparked concerns among environmentalists and experts over the potential ecological impact. Beginning November 1, the island will be open to visitors until March 15, extending the tourism season by six weeks compared to the previous timeline, which ended on January 31. Additionally, the daily visitor cap will increase from 2,000 to 3,500, a 75 percent rise.
Tourism operators and local residents have welcomed the move, citing the economic benefits for the region. However, questions remain about whether the natural environment of this ecologically sensitive island can sustain the increased human activity. Critics are calling for clear scientific evidence or credible environmental assessments to justify the decision, especially as ongoing resort construction and other signs of environmental strain have been reported.
The government has maintained certain protective measures, including restrictions on overnight stays, noise levels, beach lighting, and activities detrimental to biodiversity. It has also introduced a Tk 100 environmental conservation fee for visitors. Nonetheless, enforcement of these regulations is viewed with skepticism by some observers, who doubt the authorities’ capacity to oversee compliance effectively or to ensure that funds collected will be allocated appropriately toward conservation efforts.
Concerns about environmental management extend beyond St Martin’s Island. In Bandarban, resorts marketed as ecotourism ventures have been accused of clearing forested areas, altering landscapes, and blocking natural waterways. Near the Sundarbans, a UNESCO World Heritage site critical for its unique mangrove ecosystems, reports indicate that 21 resorts and cottages have been established without proper environmental clearances or registration, with an additional 10 projects pending approval.
The government is also facing scrutiny for considering the placement of liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals close to or within the Sundarbans, including at Akram Point. Forest officials have warned that such developments could harm mangroves, dolphins, and other wildlife. Moreover, in Gazipur, the construction of a waste transfer station within Bhawal National Park proceeded despite objections from the Department of Forest and without environmental clearance. In Patuakhali’s Rangabali, hundreds of trees were cut down in a reserved forest area following a land lease granted by the district administration.
These multiple instances reflect a broader pattern of environmental safeguards being overlooked or inadequately enforced, sometimes involving state authorities. Environmental advocates lament that the current government, which had been expected to demonstrate stronger stewardship, appears to be falling short in its protection of vital ecosystems.
Experts emphasize that development causing destruction to forests, biodiversity, and fragile habitats is ultimately unsustainable. They urge the government to provide a transparent scientific rationale for relaxing tourism restrictions on St Martin’s Island and to reconsider projects that threaten protected areas. The call also includes ensuring strict enforcement of conservation laws to balance economic growth with environmental preservation.
