The Iranian-backed Houthi militia in Yemen has intensified its multifaceted conflict with Saudi Arabia, combining military actions with an increasingly sophisticated propaganda campaign that leverages recently released U.S. Justice Department files related to Jeffrey Epstein. The group, which controls significant parts of Yemen and opposes the Saudi-backed internationally recognized government, is focusing its messaging on allegations linking Saudi figures to Epstein, the deceased American financier and sex offender.

In a notable shift, the Houthis have highlighted reports suggesting that individuals connected to the Saudi royal court sent tapestries that once covered the Kaaba — Islam’s holiest site in Mecca — to Epstein’s private island. This narrative is being used to challenge Saudi Arabia’s moral authority and to counter accusations by Riyadh that the Houthis launched a drone attack on Mecca last month. Saudi officials have so far not publicly addressed the Epstein-related allegations.

Mahdi al-Mashat, president of the Houthi Supreme Political Council, stated that those who supplied Epstein with the Kaaba’s covering are the same as those allegedly targeting Mecca. This claim has been disseminated widely across the Houthi media network, including via speeches, songs, social media influencers, and video commentaries, reflecting an evolution from a limited communication effort to a comprehensive media operation spanning television, radio, websites, newspapers, and multiple digital platforms.

Analysts note that the Houthis, as part of Iran’s “axis of resistance,” frequently invoke Epstein in their rhetoric, portraying him as symbolic of deep-rooted corruption associated with the United States, Israel, and their allies—including Saudi Arabia. Their leader, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, has referred to Epstein’s files as evidence of a “Zionist incubator” that shapes elites and leaders aligned against their cause. This framing links Saudi Arabia, despite its lack of formal diplomatic ties with Israel, to a broader opposition to the U.S. and Israel, reinforcing the Houthis’ anti-American and anti-Israeli stance.

The group’s messaging also aims to undermine Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s standing, with cultural content such as music videos and satirical dramas portraying the Saudi leadership in a critical light. Yemeni comedian Mustafa al-Momurr, once critical of the Houthis and detained by them, has since produced various pieces supportive of their narrative, though the circumstances of his shift remain unclear.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia’s allied Yemeni government maintains its own fragmented propaganda efforts, hindered by internal divisions within its Presidential Leadership Council and affiliated military factions. Unlike the Houthis’ coordinated media approach, these groups lack a unified communication strategy.

The recent escalation of the Yemeni civil war since August, coinciding with the broader regional tensions involving the U.S., Israel, and Iran, has intensified the conflict’s humanitarian toll. The United Nations reports approximately 260,000 displaced persons and nearly 1,600 deaths, while the World Health Organization confirms ongoing civilian casualties linked to Houthi attacks on Saudi infrastructure.

The Houthis’ propaganda campaign has taken on an increasingly global dimension, with content aligning closely with Iranian messaging strategies. Viral productions, including animated videos from Iranian-affiliated groups, depict the conflict in symbolic terms, reflecting narratives of resistance against Saudi and U.S. interests.

This media effort has also found unexpected resonance among some international audiences, including certain right-wing figures in the United States who have expressed support for the Houthis, sometimes promoting conspiracy theories connected to Epstein.

As the fighting continues, the intertwining of military conflict and media warfare by the Houthis underscores a complex information battlefield aimed at eroding Saudi Arabia’s domestic and international legitimacy amid one of the region’s most protracted and devastating conflicts.