An Eritrean asylum seeker who arrived in the United Kingdom in 2024 has successfully challenged the Home Office’s determination that he was an adult, persuading a judge to treat him as a child. The individual, identified only as BSB, appeared before an Upper Tribunal judge after the National Age Assessment Board concluded he was not entitled to child protection benefits.

BSB, now 19, traveled from Eritrea to Belgium before boarding a lorry bound for the UK. Upon arrival in Folkestone, he gave immigration authorities multiple dates of birth ranging from 1996 to 2007 and used a variety of names. The asylum seeker also reportedly maintained an image consistent with an older individual, including a “healthy beard” and a “fine moustache,” which he deliberately reflected in his social media avatars on Snapchat and TikTok.

Despite physical indicators such as facial hair, a visible Adam’s apple, and what the Home Office described as a five o’clock shadow, Upper Tribunal Judge Bruce ruled that these signs did not conclusively prove BSB was over 18 when first assessed. The judge sided with the asylum seeker’s claim, leading to a judicial review in his favor.

As a result, the Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has been ordered to contribute £10,000 toward BSB’s legal expenses. The Home Office’s legal team was unable to demonstrate that BSB was an adult at the time of the initial assessment. Officials are reportedly considering an appeal against the ruling.

The Home Office underscored the importance of reliable age assessments in border security, emphasizing ongoing efforts to improve the process. A spokesperson highlighted plans to incorporate advanced artificial intelligence technology to enhance accuracy in determining ages during immigration screening.

This case underscores the complexities involved in age verification for asylum seekers, where physical appearance and documentation may not always align, posing challenges for the authorities in balancing child protection obligations with immigration enforcement.