Dan Eveson, a 37-year-old former factory worker and ex-soldier, has been denied Personal Independence Payment (PIP) support nearly a year after being severely injured in the Liverpool parade crash last May. The incident, in which a Ford Galaxy driven by Paul Doyle plowed into the crowd, left Mr. Eveson with a torn trapezius muscle, a broken sternum, and three cracked ribs.

The crash also severely injured his partner, Sheree Aldridge, who spent weeks in hospital treating a leg wound, and their five-month-old baby Teddy, who was thrown 15 feet but miraculously unharmed. The family lives in Cannock, Staffordshire.

Following the accident, Mr. Eveson was forced to leave his factory laborer position due to persistent back pain and mobility issues. In February, he applied for PIP, citing his inability to stand for longer than 30 minutes and difficulties managing everyday tasks independently. He also referenced previous injuries sustained during his service in the Royal Military Police.

However, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) recently informed Mr. Eveson that his application had been rejected, stating he did not meet the required criteria for financial support. PIP eligibility guidelines specify that payments are made to individuals with long-term physical or mental conditions that substantially limit day-to-day activities.

Mr. Eveson described his reaction to the decision as “disgusted,” emphasizing the drastic change to his life since the crash. He expressed frustration over the lack of support, noting the ongoing struggle to provide for his family on universal credit payments of approximately £1,600 per month, which must cover rent and six children. The couple has recently had to downsize their vehicle and cancel a car finance plan due to financial strain.

Mental health challenges have also persisted for the family. Mr. Eveson has been on an NHS physiotherapy waiting list since March and has received just two counseling sessions. He reported continuing nightmares, flashbacks, and anger related to the crash.

Ms. Aldridge, who is on a temporary employment contract with no long-term stability, said PIP support could have eased their burden, particularly as she juggles work and caring for their young children. She highlighted the toll the crash and subsequent financial difficulties have taken on their relationship.

Paul Doyle, who changed his plea to guilty shortly before his trial in May, is serving a prison sentence of 21 years and six months after being convicted on 17 charges related to the crash, which injured 134 people.

The DWP spokesperson reiterated that PIP is awarded based on how a person’s condition impacts their daily needs and noted that applicants dissatisfied with decisions can request reconsiderations or appeals. The case underscores ongoing concerns about the accessibility and fairness of the PIP assessment process, which has faced criticism from campaigners and affected numerous claimants.