First Lady Melania Trump has brokered a temporary ceasefire between Russian and Ukrainian forces in the southern Ukrainian city of Oleshky to allow for humanitarian aid delivery and civilian evacuations, the White House announced Friday. The agreement marks a rare direct intervention by the first lady in the ongoing conflict, which has left the city under Russian occupation since early 2022 and its residents cut off from critical supplies.

The ceasefire is set to take effect starting October 29, with Russian forces agreeing to halt military activity in the Kherson region surrounding Oleshky. According to General Valery Gerasimov, Russia’s chief of general staff, Russian troops will cease fire on the Kherson axis from 4 a.m. Moscow time on October 27 to facilitate a humanitarian operation in the area, including the safe passage of aid convoys. The Kremlin expressed appreciation for Melania Trump’s involvement, with spokesman Dmitry Peskov describing her role as significant to the deal.

Oleshky, situated on the southern bank of the Dnipro River, has been devastated by conflict and environmental disaster, including severe flooding following the destruction of the Kakhovka Dam in June 2023. The city’s population has sharply declined from around 24,000 before the war to approximately 1,700 residents, mostly elderly and vulnerable individuals, including some 50 children. Conditions are dire, with severe shortages of food, clean water, medicine, and power, and roads around the city remain heavily mined, complicating aid efforts and evacuation.

Ukraine’s human rights ombudsman, Dmytro Lubinets, who led Ukraine’s side in negotiations, described the operation as “extremely challenging” but welcomed the first lady’s role in advancing a framework for the ceasefire, humanitarian deliveries, and civilian evacuations. Under the terms agreed, civilian leaders from both Russia and Ukraine will assess aid needs on the ground, and residents wishing to evacuate will receive coordinated support and transportation to their destination of choice — either Russian or Ukrainian-held territory. Lubinets also confirmed that the ceasefire and humanitarian mission could serve as a model for future efforts.

Melania Trump’s office identified her as the exclusive intermediary in the talks, stating that she initiated discussions after learning about the crisis during a private meeting at the United Nations General Assembly in late September. Her involvement included negotiating directly with leadership from both Russia and Ukraine to define the terms of the ceasefire.

To ensure transparency, an impartial American media organization, identified by sources as the pro-Trump network Newsmax, will accompany humanitarian teams and document the process, according to the first lady’s advisers.

The announcement comes amid broader tensions between the Trump administration and Kyiv. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has criticized moves by the administration perceived as favoring Russia, including waiving new Russian sanctions and halting the delivery of Patriot missile systems. Ukraine has also faced internet restrictions affecting military communications, with ongoing disputes over responsibility.

While the ceasefire and evacuation plan have been welcomed as crucial steps for the residents of Oleshky, doubts have been expressed regarding the agreement’s implementation, given the highly unstable security situation and the challenges of enforcing a localized truce amid ongoing hostilities. Former residents and humanitarian observers have cautioned that conditions remain perilous, and the success of the operation will depend on strict adherence to the ceasefire and effective coordination on the ground.

Melania Trump has previously been involved in humanitarian efforts related to the conflict, notably advocating for the reunification of displaced Ukrainian and Russian children. President Trump praised her work on the Oleshky ceasefire as “her initiative” and said both sides are cooperating with her efforts, adding that her focus is “saving children.” When asked about the possibility of her joining future peace talks, he responded: “No, but it’s not the worst idea I’ve ever heard.”