No justice in trial delays, says Leveson

By the Editorial Team · Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Retired judge Sir Brian Leveson has called for reforms to the jury trial system to address severe delays in criminal cases, proposing limits on jury trials for offenses with prison terms over three years. His recommendations have sparked debate, with Prime Minister Andy Burnham expressing hesitation to reduce jury access despite the growing backlog and resource shortages threatening timely justice for victims.

A retired senior judge has renewed calls for reform of jury trials amid growing concerns that delays in the criminal justice system are denying victims timely justice. Sir Brian Leveson, who conducted a review into the justice system, has highlighted the need to reorganize criminal courts to address these issues, including proposing a reduction in the scope of the right to trial by jury.

Leveson's proposals have sparked debate after Prime Minister Andy Burnham signaled a possible withdrawal of the plan. Burnham expressed reservations, stating that his "instincts are that we need to find ways of not reducing access to jury trial." The Prime Minister’s comments suggest a reluctance to limit jury trials, despite the logistical challenges outlined by Leveson.

Leveson, however, underscored the practical difficulties facing the current system. While affirming his strong support for jury trials, he emphasized that proceeding without reform is unsustainable. He pointed to a backlog of cases with trials scheduled as far out as 2029 and 2030, describing such delays as a “denial of justice.” He also noted the strain on resources, including an insufficient number of courts, judges, and lawyers to handle current and projected caseloads.

A key issue cited by Leveson is the withdrawal of victims from the justice process, a consequence he attributes to the delays. He acknowledged that some legal professionals oppose curtailing jury trials, but argued that without change, the system will continue to face increasing pressure. “If not this, then what?” he questioned, stressing that simply maintaining the status quo is not a viable solution.

The proposal to restrict jury trials would apply only to offences where the likely prison sentence exceeds three years, a measure intended to alleviate the burden on courts and streamline proceedings. However, critics worry this could limit defendants’ rights and alter fundamental aspects of criminal justice.

The debate over jury trial reform reflects broader challenges within the justice system, including case backlog, resource limitations, and balancing timely court access with procedural fairness. As discussions continue, stakeholders remain divided over how best to ensure both efficient and equitable legal processes.

This article was reported by synthesizing coverage from multiple independent news outlets to present a balanced, unbiased account. Read about our editorial standards. Spotted an error? Let us know.