One Nation’s ABC mistake

By the Editorial Team · Thursday, September 10, 2026

One Nation has limited ABC's access to its press conferences amid accusations of the broadcaster's left-leaning bias against the party. Observers warn that restricting media engagement could hinder One Nation's political growth and weaken its readiness for future government roles.

Debate continues over the relationship between the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the One Nation political party, with discussions focusing on allegations of media bias and the strategic implications of press access. Critics argue that the ABC exhibits a clear left-leaning bias against One Nation and other right-of-center parties, resulting in coverage that is often perceived as unfair to the nationalist party. This perception has led One Nation to restrict ABC access to its press conferences.

Despite acknowledging the ABC’s partiality, some observers contend that One Nation’s approach to barring the national broadcaster is counterproductive. As One Nation increasingly positions itself within the upper echelons of Australian politics, its leadership faces the realities of a challenging and frequently adversarial political environment. Maintaining open lines of communication with the media, including confrontations with difficult or hostile outlets, is viewed by some as essential to the party’s long-term viability.

Supporters of press freedom emphasize that providing the ABC with access to One Nation events is consistent with fundamental principles of transparency and a free press. They argue that engaging with the national broadcaster, regardless of its editorial stance, prepares the party for the rigorous scrutiny and political combat it will encounter should it secure influential roles in state or federal government. This exposure is considered a form of experience that could strengthen the party’s resilience.

Moreover, interaction with the ABC may prompt internal benefits for One Nation. The party has historically faced challenges related to internal division and factionalism. Navigating media scrutiny has the potential to toughen the party’s cohesion and readiness to withstand pressure, both internally and externally.

While the dispute over media bias remains unresolved, the consensus among some political analysts is that refusing to engage with a major national news outlet may do more harm than good. In an environment where political survival often hinges on managing media relations effectively, opening dialogue—even with a critical press—is seen as a necessary aspect of the democratic process.

This article was reported by synthesizing coverage from multiple independent news outlets to present a balanced, unbiased account. Read about our editorial standards. Spotted an error? Let us know.