Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s infrequent use of the Chequers country estate has raised questions about his continued access to the historic residence, according to Conservative lawmakers. The 1,000-acre estate in Buckinghamshire, which has served as the official country home for British prime ministers since 1921, was donated to the government in 1917 and is governed by the Chequers Estate Act.

Under the terms of the Act, prime ministers are expected to make regular use of the estate, with the intention that spending time in the countryside benefits both national leadership and the country itself. The Act stipulates that if a prime minister chooses not to utilize the residence, the rights to the property may pass to other officials such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Foreign Secretary, or even the US Ambassador.

Conservative MPs have expressed concerns that Burnham’s focus on London and Manchester has led to the estate being largely unused. A Tory source warned that Burnham risks losing access to Chequers if the property remains effectively mothballed. Mike Wood, the Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office, criticized the prime minister for his minimal engagement with rural life, suggesting that the estate’s use was designed to provide a necessary balance between urban and country perspectives for government leaders.

Downing Street has denied that the prime minister is neglecting Chequers, stating that Burnham has used the residence on occasion despite frequently spending weekends at his home in Manchester. A government source added that the prime minister is considering hosting a New Year’s Eve event at the estate, indicating some plans to activate the property in the near future.

The Chequers Estate, set among the Chiltern Hills and woodland, was initially intended to lure prime ministers into the countryside for at least two days each week. This was meant to offer respite and reflection away from the demands of city life and official duties in London.

As of now, there has been no official statement on any changes to Burnham’s access to the property, but ongoing debate highlights varying views on the estate’s role in supporting the prime minister’s work-life balance and responsibilities.