Prime Minister Andy Burnham has offered insight into his literary preferences during a recent conversation on Times Radio, reflecting his working-class upbringing and academic background in English literature. Unlike some politicians who shy away from naming favourite books or works, Burnham cited a selection of authors and titles that highlight both political and non-political themes.

Among Burnham’s favourite works is Tony Harrison’s poem *V*, a politically charged piece first published in 1985 following the miners’ strike. Harrison, a native of Leeds, used the poem to address the social and economic decline in northern England, subjects that resonate with Burnham’s personal and regional background. Harrison, who passed away last year, was noted for combining poignant social commentary with literary craft, and *V* remains one of his most recognized works.

Burnham also expressed admiration for Philip Larkin, known for his often bleak and straightforward poetry. Larkin’s work is frequently characterized by a conservative worldview, but Burnham’s appreciation of his poetry indicates a taste that extends beyond purely progressive or political literature.

In addition to these poets, Burnham named Joseph Conrad’s *Heart of Darkness* as a significant influence. The novella, which explores the atrocities committed in the Belgian Congo, has been the subject of extensive debate, particularly in light of Nigerian writer Chinua Achebe’s critique of the book as racist. Despite these controversies, Burnham acknowledged its literary importance.

When discussing Shakespeare, Burnham cited *Hamlet* as his preferred play. The tragedy of the indecisive Danish prince is widely regarded as one of Shakespeare’s greatest works. Observers noted the contrast between the play’s theme of hesitation and Burnham’s decisive leadership style, especially in his prominent role within his party.

Overall, Burnham’s literary choices reflect a blend of social awareness rooted in his northern English background and a broader appreciation for canonical literature. His willingness to engage openly with literature, including politically nuanced works, sets him apart from some of his contemporaries in British politics who rarely disclose their reading habits.