Democrats are increasingly focusing their midterm election strategy on President Donald Trump, framing their message around economic inequality and criticizing the concentration of wealth among elite figures like Trump. This approach has been dubbed the “Epstein class,” a term popularized by California Congressman Ro Khanna to describe a wealthy and often unaccountable group of billionaires who live insulated lives, contrasting them with working-class Americans.

Khanna’s use of the term highlights perceived disparities between the affluent elite and everyday citizens, particularly amid ongoing economic challenges such as fluctuating tariffs and unresolved foreign policy conflicts, including the stalled situation with Iran. The Democrats see this narrative as a way to connect with voters who are struggling financially and may feel left behind in the current economic climate.

Polling data has provided some encouragement for the Democrats, showing a six-point lead over Republicans on handling the economy ahead of the midterms. Yet, experts caution that this advantage may be fragile without a clearly defined economic plan to address broader issues. Critics note that reducing the campaign to an attack on Trump’s wealth and associations might not be sufficient to sustain long-term voter support.

On the Republican side, the influx of donations from high-profile billionaires is notable. Reports indicate that major contributors like Elon Musk, as well as Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and cryptocurrency investors such as Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and the Winklevoss twins, are investing tens of millions of dollars to back the GOP. This financial muscle suggests the affluent class is also mobilizing vigorously to maintain influence in the political landscape.

If Democrats regain control of the House of Representatives, questions remain about their next steps. While Trump has anticipated potential impeachment proceedings, Democratic leaders have been cautious due to past experiences where impeachment efforts did not yield the desired political outcomes. Hakeem Jeffries, the minority Speaker of the House, has expressed a commitment to holding members of what he terms the “Trump cartel” accountable, signaling continued scrutiny of Trump and his associates.

However, there is debate over whether prolonged investigations and legal battles will resonate with voters or deepen disenchantment with Washington politics. Some analysts warn that repeated probes, or “lawfare,” may energize Trump’s base and hinder the Democrats’ prospects in upcoming presidential contests.

Ultimately, the current strategy of focusing on Trump’s wealth and influence may serve as a short-term tactic for the Democratic Party, but it leaves open larger questions about their broader policy vision and identity. As the midterm elections approach, the party faces the challenge of articulating what it stands for beyond opposition to Trump.