Rwanda’s announcement of plans to host a Formula 1 Grand Prix in the early 2030s has sparked a mixed response both domestically and internationally. The government marked the occasion on October 13 with a high-profile ceremony in Kigali, unveiling a historic agreement with Formula 1’s governing body and the International Automobile Federation (FIA).

The initiative is viewed by the Rwandan leadership as a strategic investment aimed at boosting tourism, creating jobs, and attracting new business opportunities. President Paul Kagame described the event as an “honour” and expressed confidence that it would benefit the country and the wider region for decades. Rwanda, a landlocked East African nation still emerging from the shadow of its 1994 genocide, has increasingly used sports as a means of repositioning its global image and showcasing its organisational capabilities.

The proposed Formula 1 race, set against Rwanda’s lush hills and diverse wildlife, promises high-profile international exposure. As one of the world’s most-watched sporting spectacles, behind only the Olympic Games and FIFA World Cup in global viewership, F1 offers Kigali a platform to raise its international profile.

However, the project has drawn criticism from human rights groups and advocacy organisations. Amnesty International swiftly condemned the deal as an act of “sportswashing,” accusing the Rwandan government of seeking to use the race to gloss over its alleged human rights abuses. Similar critiques have been leveled against Formula 1 in recent years, pointing to its past partnerships with countries that have been widely criticised for poor human rights records, including China and Azerbaijan.

Concerns also stem from Rwanda’s contentious regional role. Kenneth Roth, former head of Human Rights Watch, highlighted Rwanda’s military and financial backing of the M23 rebel group operating in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, which has been accused of numerous abuses.

Economically, questions have been raised about the viability and priorities of hosting such an expensive event. Rwanda remains a low-income country, with a GDP per capita of just over US$1,100 and a Human Development Index ranking of 159 out of 193 nations. Critics argue that the substantial funds required to build a state-of-the-art racing circuit, along with hosting fees typically levied by Formula 1, could be better allocated to critical public services like healthcare and education.

Despite this, government officials and private sector representatives remain optimistic. Jean-Guy Afrika, CEO of the Rwanda Development Board, emphasized strong private sector interest and the potential economic benefits from an influx of approximately 100,000 visitors during the race weekend. The project reportedly enjoys financial backing from Qatar, which is also investing in infrastructure near Kigali, including a new international airport in Bugesera, close to the planned circuit site.

While many Rwandans express pride in the nation’s ability to attract the pinnacle of motorsport, some local entrepreneurs remain cautious. “The economics of hosting F1 in Rwanda will not be for everyone, but for a tiny percentage of the already rich,” noted Kigali-based entrepreneur Amon Niyigena, reflecting broader concerns about the race’s long-term impact.

As Rwanda embarks on this ambitious sporting venture, observers continue to monitor how the opportunity balances economic aspirations, political realities, and international scrutiny.