The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Uttar Pradesh government to consider a plea highlighting the risks associated with the sale of liquor in tetrapack packaging, particularly concerning its potential impact on educational institutions in the state. The petitioner, advocate Ashok Pande, challenged a February 2023 administrative decision under the state excise policy that permits the manufacture, packaging, and sale of liquor in small tetrapacks.
Pande argued that such packaging could facilitate the smuggling and consumption of alcohol on college and school premises, posing a threat to students’ health and future prospects. The Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, did not comment on the policy itself but allowed Pande to submit a formal representation to the designated state authority for consideration. The court instructed the government to examine the concerns raised by the petitioner and make a reasoned decision accordingly.
This development follows prior observations made by the Supreme Court in November 2023 when it expressed serious concerns over the sale of liquor in small tetrapack containers. At that time, former Justice Kant noted the deceptive nature of such packaging, recounting an instance in court where he mistook a sample packet for juice. The court had described the practice as potentially hazardous and likely to attract young, impressionable consumers.
During that hearing, the bench questioned the rationale behind allowing these compact liquor packs, noting the ease with which they could be brought into schools or colleges, potentially deceiving parents and contributing to underage drinking. One judge also warned that government policies aimed at increasing revenue through such means could ultimately undermine public health and welfare.
While the Supreme Court has thus far refrained from issuing directives on the legality of tetrapack liquor sales, it has shown a willingness to engage with public interest concerns about the possible social harm caused by this packaging method. The matter remains under active consideration as the Uttar Pradesh government reviews the petition in light of the court’s instructions.
