Two Embraer jets operated by South African airline Airlink conducted a low-level flyby over Cape Town Stadium on Saturday ahead of the second rugby union Test match between South Africa and New Zealand, drawing mixed reactions over safety concerns. The aircraft passed approximately 41 to 46 feet (12 to 14 meters) above the stadium roof, where an estimated 56,000 spectators were gathered, according to data from the flight tracking service Flightradar24.

The jets, flying in formation at around 150 knots (172 mph), were empty of passengers and carried three senior captains each in the roles of commander, co-pilot, and safety officer. Airlink, a sponsor of the South African rugby union team, affirmed that the flyby was meticulously planned and rehearsed. The airline also noted that the South African Civil Aviation Authority and Air Traffic Navigation Services had provided guidance, approval, and support for the operation.

Airlink issued a statement acknowledging public concerns expressed on social media and in online forums about the low altitude maneuver, emphasizing that the flights complied with all relevant civil aviation safety limits. Flight data reportedly confirmed that both jets operated within established parameters for speed and altitude.

The practice of performing flybys during major rugby matches has historical precedent in South Africa, dating back to a Boeing 747 flight over a Johannesburg stadium before the 1995 World Cup final between the same rival teams. However, aviation observers noted that this recent flyby was exceptionally low and visually striking.

Some experts voiced worries about the narrow margin for error involved. Chris Martinus, president of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association South Africa, described the lead aircraft’s trajectory as “dodging over the roof” with rapid altitude changes that made it potentially risky. He highlighted that at such low heights, pilots have limited options if an emergency occurs.

The flyby incorporated a cloud of pink dust rising from the stadium roof, adding a dramatic visual element to the event. While the stunt was intended as a spectacle to engage fans and promote team sponsorships, it has sparked debate regarding the balance between showmanship and safety in aviation displays at public sporting events.

Officials have yet to announce any formal review of the procedure, and no incidents were reported during or after the flyby. The event underscores the ongoing discussion about managing risk in aviation-related stunts, especially when performed in proximity to large crowds.