In the remote city of Bethel, Alaska, where a pound of tomatoes can cost nearly $7 and milk exceeds $13 a gallon, rising prices have intensified a competitive U.S. Senate race that could shape national politics. Gasoline prices in the region have surged to $10 a gallon, arriving once yearly by barge when the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta’s rivers thaw. Residents like Nicholai Joekay, who rely heavily on subsistence hunting and fishing due to the prohibitive cost of groceries, say these economic pressures deepen hardships across rural Alaska.
The Democratic challenger, former congresswoman Mary Peltola, is seeking to unseat incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan. Both candidates emphasize their commitment to addressing Alaska’s distinct challenges, but their approaches and records have become points of fierce debate. Peltola, a native of Bethel and a former working fisherman, has campaigned on promises to alleviate the high cost of living, directly criticizing Republican policies she argues have led to cuts in vital supports such as public radio, veterans’ benefits, and nutrition assistance programs.
Sullivan, who has served in the Senate since 2015, counters that his tenure has brought substantial federal resources to Alaska, including pandemic relief and protections for the state’s fisheries. He highlights his legislative accomplishments, contrasting them with Peltola’s record in Congress, where she did not have legislation signed into law. Sullivan also points to his strong advocacy for Alaska Native Corporations and his role in renewing exceptions for subsistence whale hunting and improving infrastructure linking isolated Native communities.
Alaska’s unique geography and demographic makeup make federal programs critically important. Medicaid funds medical flights for rural residents, and public radio provides essential weather updates. Both candidates’ records and personal backgrounds reflect deep ties to the state’s indigenous Yup’ik communities and the subsistence lifestyle that sustains many residents.
The race is further complicated by national political dynamics. Alaska voters gave former President Donald Trump a decisive victory in 2024, and many remain skeptical of national Democrats due to perceived opposition to oil and gas development, a key industry funding much of the state budget. Peltola, however, has been recognized by supporters for her bipartisan approach, including her efforts to push the Biden administration to approve a major North Slope energy project.
Recent reports have surfaced alleging that Peltola fostered a hostile work environment during her time in Congress and the current campaign. Her spokesperson attributed this behavior to personal grief following the deaths of her husband and mother but emphasized that she treats her staff with respect. Despite these allegations, many Democrats and independent strategists remain supportive of her candidacy.
Sullivan has questioned Peltola’s effectiveness and attendance record in Congress, noting her missed votes and her unremarkable post-Congressional career at a lobbying firm. Peltola’s supporters argue that travel demands for Alaska representatives contribute to higher absenteeism and cite her personal struggles as context for her record.
Local perspectives reveal a nuanced electorate. Theresa Peterson, a Kodiak commercial fisherman, credits Sullivan with securing USDA benefits for fisheries and restricting Russian imports but criticizes his backing of policies that reduced funding for agencies vital to fishing safety and environmental protection. Others value Peltola’s lived experience and local roots, with some longtime Alaskans viewing her as a genuine advocate who understands rural challenges firsthand.
Political analysts rate the Senate contest as a toss-up, underscoring Alaska’s predominantly independent voter base and the limited influence of party labels. Both candidates have backing from notable figures: Sullivan enjoys endorsements from industry groups and state leaders, while Peltola is supported by Democrats hoping to capitalize on widespread economic frustration and her appeal across party lines.
As the election nears, Alaskans weigh which candidate better embodies the expertise and vision necessary to navigate the state’s complex economic and cultural landscape amid rising prices and shifting political tides.