Sir Keir Starmer has denied seeking revenge against his likely successor, Andy Burnham, following his resignation as Labour leader and Prime Minister. Lord Hermer, Starmer’s Attorney General and long-time ally, emphatically rejected claims that the outgoing leader intends to undermine Burnham, describing such assertions as “absolute nonsense.” Speaking to Times Radio, Lord Hermer stressed that Starmer hopes Burnham’s forthcoming government will succeed, despite the difficult transition.
While Starmer had previously pledged to “keep my mouth shut” and refrain from interference as he steps down, he recently broke that promise by publishing an article on his Substack newsletter offering advice to Burnham. In his essay, titled "Passing on the Torch," Starmer urged Burnham to prioritise support for children, describing it as a cause the new leadership should embrace. He framed this recommendation as an exception to his vow, highlighting the issue as a pivotal matter for the nation.
Burnham’s rise to the premiership was set in motion by his victory in the Makerfield by-election last month, which prompted Starmer’s resignation. With no immediate leadership challengers, Burnham is expected to assume office by mid-July. However, reports indicate that Burnham is being excluded from key defence briefings ahead of his formal appointment, raising concerns about the continuity and preparedness of the incoming administration.
Specifically, Starmer is reported to have sidelined Burnham from planning a Gulf mission aimed at removing Iranian mines from the Strait of Hormuz, a foreign policy initiative Starmer is keen to count as part of his legacy. Sources claim officials within the Ministry of Defence advised Downing Street to involve Burnham in the planning process to prevent him inheriting a conflict early in his tenure. Nonetheless, No 10 reportedly assured that the situation was “under control,” while expressing hopes that Burnham would bring experienced figures from defence and foreign affairs to bolster his team.
In his article, Starmer reflected on the shortcomings of his administration, noting that it failed to articulate a clear and accessible vision for Britain’s future. He reaffirmed the Labour Party’s central role as the “vehicle for social justice” in the country but acknowledged that the party could be “frustrating” to navigate. Starmer warned of the risks if Labour were removed from the political landscape, allowing “forces of reaction, conservatism and grievance” to divide the nation. He described the political landscape as a “battle for the soul of the nation” that Burnham must now lead.
Starmer also cited his government’s achievements, including ending the two-child benefit rule, extending free school meals, and new measures to improve youth employment. In his first broadcast interview since announcing his resignation, he described the decision as “intensely personal,” underscoring the gravity of the moment as political leadership in the UK prepares to change hands.
