Keir Starmer’s departure from parliament has sparked discussion about the conduct of former prime ministers upon leaving office, highlighting varied approaches taken by recent British leaders during their transitions.

Starmer, who stepped down following his party leadership defeat, has been criticized for what some perceive as uncollegiate behavior toward his former cabinet members, including Andy Burnham. Observers note that while Starmer feels aggrieved by certain colleagues, he is also widely seen as having played a central role in his own political decline.

Comparisons have been drawn with previous prime ministers and their departures. Tony Blair left Parliament immediately after resigning as prime minister in 2007, never expressing an intention to remain as an MP. David Cameron initially planned to stay but reversed that decision when he recognized that his continued presence could undermine Theresa May’s premiership. May, however, chose to remain in Parliament, in part to voice opposition to Boris Johnson’s policies, an action that earned her praise amid widespread media scrutiny of Johnson’s tenure.

Rishi Sunak is noted as the only recent former prime minister to have exited office and Parliament with what many consider perfect decorum, maintaining professional conduct throughout his transition. In contrast, Boris Johnson left office abruptly, and Liz Truss was voted out by her constituency in South West Norfolk.

Starmer now joins the list of former leaders whose departures were marked by tensions with successors or political adversaries, reflecting a pattern of complex and sometimes contentious exits in contemporary British politics. The varied approaches underscore the challenges faced by prime ministers in navigating their legacies and relationships as they transition from the country’s highest office.