China’s state media have outlined key objectives and red lines ahead of a summit scheduled for this week between President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, emphasizing the importance of maintaining “constructive strategic stability” in bilateral ties.

A leading editorial in the Chinese Communist Party’s official newspaper highlighted that the leaders will provide “strategic guidance” to help shape a stable and cooperative relationship between the two countries. The article portrayed recent interactions positively, noting an increase in “positive factors” since the last meeting between Xi and Trump in Beijing four months ago.

Following that meeting, both sides agreed on the need to sustain “constructive strategic stability,” a framework Beijing considers essential for managing relations during the remainder of Trump’s term. While the U.S. called for fairness and reciprocity, Chinese commentary stressed that the framework should extend beyond the immediate administration, guiding relations for years to come.

Central to China’s approach is the management of Taiwan-related issues, which the editorial described as a shared concern and a critical component of bilateral stability. It explicitly listed “Taiwan, democracy and human rights, the path and system, and development rights” as “red lines” that must not be crossed, framing these issues as guardrails for the relationship.

Meanwhile, reports indicate the Trump administration may delay announcing major arms sales to Taiwan until after an upcoming international summit in Shenzhen in November, suggesting sensitivities around the Taiwan issue remain high.

State media also cautioned against a “cold war mentality” among some U.S. officials who view China as a strategic rival, warning that such perceptions underlie many bilateral difficulties. This stance was attributed to a belief in zero-sum competition, which Beijing rejects in favor of managed dialogue and cooperation.

Chinese officials have repeatedly asserted that “constructive strategic stability” does not disregard the existence of competition, particularly in areas like artificial intelligence, but calls for avoiding confrontation. Commentary urged that economic and trade cooperation continue to act as stabilizing forces in the relationship.

One social media channel linked to China’s foreign ministry underscored that China’s national strength and international influence have grown substantially since Xi’s last visit to the U.S. in 2015, and that collaborative ties should take precedence over attempts at decoupling or confrontation.

As the summit approaches, Beijing’s messaging reflects a desire to maintain dialogue, manage differences, and build on the progress made earlier this year, while clearly signaling boundaries it considers inviolable.