Following a recent Supreme Court decision blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at restricting mail-in voting ahead of the upcoming midterm elections, state and local election officials across the United States are moving to reassure voters about the security and reliability of mail voting.

On Monday, the Supreme Court halted a plan by the administration to have the U.S. Postal Service screen mail ballots before delivery. The administration argued that this measure would prevent ineligible individuals from voting. However, many state election officials expressed concerns that the proposed intervention would cause confusion and logistical challenges so close to the elections. The court’s ruling effectively left mail voting procedures under state control, a domain traditionally managed by individual states as outlined by the Constitution.

The decision comes amid ongoing false claims and criticism by President Trump regarding the integrity of mail voting. Trump has repeatedly made unsubstantiated allegations of fraud related to mail ballots, despite himself having used mail voting in the past. Following the ruling, Trump condemned the Supreme Court’s conservative majority for not dissenting and described the decision as a “horrible, highly political” loss, asserting that it would facilitate voter fraud by Democrats. His accusations and the evolving legal battles have contributed to confusion among voters about how mail voting will be conducted.

In response, election officials from various states have sought to reinforce public confidence in the process. For example, Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar, a Democrat, noted that his office had prepared multiple contingency plans in anticipation of different court outcomes and is now turning to voter education efforts intended to emphasize the security and legitimacy of mail ballots. These efforts include outreach through television, digital campaigns, and text messaging.

Similarly, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold emphasized that the election process in her state has continued as usual throughout the legal uncertainty. She highlighted Colorado’s ballot tracking system, which allows voters to monitor their mail-in ballots much like a package delivery, as a way to bolster trust.

In North Carolina, the first state to dispatch mail ballots for the midterms, officials affirm that the court ruling will not affect their voting timeline. Approximately 300,000 absentee ballots have already been sent. Spokesman Jason Tyson of the North Carolina Board of Elections stated that preparations remain “full steam ahead,” underscoring confidence in the established mail-in voting procedures.

Overall, election authorities nationwide are focused on educating voters and maintaining confidence in voting by mail as the midterms approach, striving to counter the uncertainties arising from legal challenges and public skepticism fueled by partisan claims.