John Humphrys, the veteran British journalist and former presenter of the BBC’s flagship news programmes, has called for the United Kingdom to consider ending its monarchy in favor of an elected president. Speaking in a recent documentary aired on Channel 4, Humphrys drew on decades of experience covering the British royal family, citing a significant decline in public respect for the institution in recent years.

Humphrys, 83, whose career spanned nearly four decades including roles on the Nine O’Clock News and Radio 4’s Today programme, witnessed key royal events firsthand. These ranged from the high-profile marriage of Prince Charles—now King Charles—to Lady Diana Spencer, through the so-called “annus horribilis,” a period marked by multiple royal crises. The journalist also referenced the controversies surrounding Prince Andrew, particularly his widely criticized Newsnight interview concerning his ties to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, which led to the prince’s withdrawal from public duties.

In the documentary titled “The Royals — Time to Go?”, Humphrys engages with both critics and supporters of the monarchy but ultimately argues that the time has come for Britain to move away from its hereditary system. He cautions against clinging to tradition, drawing attention to the example set by republics, including the United States, as a potential model for democratic leadership.

Supporters of the monarchy argue that the institution provides continuity, stability, and a unifying symbol above politics, while critics contend that it is outdated and incompatible with modern democratic values. Humphrys’s republican stance has gained attention amid ongoing debates about the role and relevance of the House of Windsor in contemporary Britain.

The discussion reflects broader conversations about national identity and governance as public opinion towards the monarchy evolves. With growing scrutiny of royal finances and conduct, such debates are likely to continue. Humphrys’s call for an elected head of state invites consideration of how the UK might redefine its constitutional framework in the decades ahead.