At the Southerly Water Reclamation Plant near Columbus, Ohio, a labor dispute has emerged over the use of goats to clear invasive vegetation on the facility’s grounds. The American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees Local 1632 recently filed a grievance against Columbus Water & Power after the agency publicized its collaboration with a goat grazing company.
The union alleges that the water department violated its collective-bargaining agreement by failing to notify them before subcontracting brush-clearing work to the goats. The dispute centers on the broader concern about job security and subcontracting, which union leaders see as undermining the workforce.
“We now have animals doing my work,” said Will Harmon, president of Local 1632. He expressed worry that increasingly, technological and other nontraditional methods could replace union labor. Columbus Water & Power confirmed it is reviewing the grievance but declined further comment due to ongoing arbitration.
The plant, located about 13 miles south of downtown Columbus, covers nearly 290 acres and can process up to 330 million gallons of wastewater daily for more than 700,000 residents. The specific challenge arose along a storm water ditch on the south side of the site, where dense growth of poison hemlock, a state-designated noxious and invasive weed, proved difficult to manage with conventional equipment. Steep terrain further limited the use of machinery.
To address this, the water department contracted a local franchise of Goats on the Go, a company specializing in vegetation management using goats. Owner Lauren Cain provided approximately 40 goats for about 10 days of work at a cost of $2,900. Cain explained that goats are naturally suited for such tasks, as their digestive systems allow them to consume poisonous plants like hemlock in quantities that do not harm them, while minimizing environmental impact compared to mechanical clearing. The goats also contribute fertilizer through their droppings.
The goats, named Kevin, Wilson, and Marti among others, browsed nearly two acres, feeding on bushes, weeds, and small trees with their typical climbing and grazing behavior. While they completed part of the task, some poison hemlock remained, as total removal could have been hazardous given the plant's toxicity.
James Fletcher, vice president of Local 1632 and a former plant maintenance mechanic, acknowledged that goats could not wholly perform the job, noting that manual labor continued afterward to finish clearing the remaining plants. He also emphasized that the use of goats did not fully address the underlying labor concerns.
Experts in labor history note that subcontracting is a common source of tension between unions and employers, often deployed either for specialized skills or cost reduction. Ileen DeVault, a labor historian at Cornell University, underscored that subcontracting circumvents labor protections and benefits, contrasting with the investment in personal protective equipment typically provided to workers.
The dispute at the Southerly Water Reclamation Plant highlights emerging challenges for unions facing nontraditional labor displacement, whether by technology or novel subcontracting methods. As arbitration proceeds, the case may set precedents for how such labor issues are addressed in public-sector workplaces.
