President Donald Trump on Tuesday characterized Iran’s leadership as “very rational” and “not radicalized” while promoting a U.S.-Iran agreement that has yet to be fully disclosed. His remarks came amid the partial publication of what are purported to be the terms of a peace deal between the two countries, which sparked uncertainty in Washington and among U.S. partners.

Details of the agreement emerged Tuesday afternoon through Israeli and Saudi news outlets, although the White House has not confirmed their accuracy. The leaked documents, which could not be independently verified by major American media, describe provisions that would ease sanctions on Iran, allow the resumption of its oil exports, lift a naval blockade, and permit access to up to $300 billion in funds intended for reconstruction via investments from Gulf states.

Complicating the picture, two separate versions of the agreement have circulated: one reported by Israel’s Channel 12, laying out 12 points, and another by Saudi outlet Al Arabiya, which lists 14 points. The versions differ in wording, sequence, and some substantive elements, adding to the opacity surrounding the deal.

The administration’s handling of the release has drawn criticism, as Congress and U.S. allies remain largely excluded from the negotiations and have yet to receive full details. The Trump administration has not yet provided a formal text of the agreement, although the president committed to making it public in due course.

Throughout his remarks, Trump praised Iranian leaders, describing them as “nice to deal with,” a characterization that contrasts with previous U.S. administrations’ descriptions of the regime. The president emphasized that the approach adopted reflects a considered strategy aimed at securing regional stability and advancing U.S. interests through diplomacy rather than confrontation.

As the situation evolves, key questions remain regarding the veracity of the leaked documents and the ultimate scope of the agreement. Congressional leaders are expected to seek further information and potentially exert pressure on the White House for greater transparency. Meanwhile, U.S. allies in the Middle East are reportedly expressing concern over being kept out of the loop on a matter with significant geopolitical implications.