U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that he had decided to cancel a planned military strike against Iran, following requests from Gulf allies and Iran itself to pause further attacks amid ongoing diplomatic discussions. Trump’s decision came after a period of heightened tensions and threats of renewed U.S. and Israeli military action aimed at pressuring Tehran to reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.

In a social media post, Trump stated that the United States remained “locked and loaded and ready to go” but agreed to withhold strikes based on a request from Iran and several Middle Eastern countries, including key Gulf partners. He indicated that the “perimeters of a deal” had been reached, which would entail the immediate and complete reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and a cessation of Iran’s nuclear threat. Israel reportedly joined the U.S. in this commitment.

Diplomatic sources revealed that officials from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates made coordinated efforts to persuade Washington to maintain a diplomatic approach and avoid further military escalation. Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman personally contacted Trump ahead of the public announcement, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and cautioning against actions that could provoke broader regional conflict.

Saudi concerns center on the potential for intensified hostilities to trigger widespread violence impacting multiple fronts, including attacks by Iranian-backed Houthi forces currently engaged in conflict with Saudi Arabia, who could attempt to close the Bab al-Mandab strait—a critical maritime passage connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden. Gulf states have expressed apprehension that renewed strikes on Iran’s energy infrastructure could destabilize global oil markets and regional security.

Seven OPEC+ countries, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, simultaneously called for a de-escalation of hostilities targeting energy assets and underscored the necessity of open sea routes for the stability of global markets. The group also announced plans to increase oil production collectively from September, reversing previous supply cuts.

Trump had intensified threats against Iran in recent days after diplomatic efforts faltered, including a warning that the U.S. would strike “very hard” if Tehran did not comply. Reports emerged that the U.S. and Israel were preparing a joint bombing campaign aimed at Iranian energy facilities. Iranian officials, however, dismissed such warnings as part of a “psychological operation,” while affirming their readiness to respond if necessary.

Some analysts view Saudi Arabia’s intervention as a strategic move to preserve regional stability and avoid shouldering the immediate consequences of any escalation. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, despite his controversial international standing, is seen as urging restraint and dialogue, warning that the United States might lack the patience or capacity to escalate the conflict decisively.

Meanwhile, negotiations involving Iran and Oman over control and financial arrangements concerning the Strait of Hormuz continue, raising the possibility of a diplomatic resolution that balances regional interests.

The Iranian government has not issued an official response to Trump’s latest announcement. However, Tehran has previously warned that any country cooperating with U.S. actions against Iran risks being “engulfed by the flames of war.” The evolving dynamics underscore the complex interplay of diplomacy, military readiness, and regional politics shaping the conflict and its potential resolution.