Ukraine has made efforts to engage with segments of the American far-right traditionally skeptical of its war effort, exemplified by a recent visit from Laura Loomer, a prominent activist known for her association with former President Donald Trump’s MAGA movement. Loomer met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, interviewed Ukraine’s acting defense minister, dined with the country’s chief rabbi, and toured an animal shelter during her trip to Kyiv late last month.

Loomer, who previously echoed Russian disinformation portraying Ukraine as controlled by neo-Nazis, described her visit as a turning point in her stance. Speaking from Kyiv, she said Ukrainian officials view her as a conduit to the Trump administration despite not holding any official position. She acknowledged having twice contacted Trump from Ukraine and recounted a shift in her perspective after reassessing pro-Russian narratives circulating among conservative influencers like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, who have expressed anti-Ukraine sentiments in connection with U.S. policy on Iran and Israel.

The reception and attention accorded to Loomer underscores ongoing Ukrainian efforts to counter skepticism within the MAGA movement and among Trump’s closest advisers. While conservative pro-Ukraine advocacy groups have long sought to build bridges through church visits, influencer delegations, and public campaigns, support from key right-wing figures has remained limited. For example, Steve Witkoff, a Trump ally and envoy, continued traveling to Russia for meetings with President Vladimir Putin but has not made similar visits to Ukraine. Additionally, officials note that Trump’s own ambivalence toward Ukraine remains a significant barrier, as he has publicly maintained a conciliatory tone toward Putin even after meeting with Zelensky.

Pro-Ukrainian advocates such as Melinda Haring, senior adviser at the nonprofit Razom for Ukraine, emphasize that while some MAGA figures express sympathy for Ukraine, tangible support is constrained so long as Trump’s position remains unchanged. Still, there are signs of potential realignment. In recent months, Trump expressed tentative support for Ukraine manufacturing Patriot missile systems, though he later appeared uncertain about pursuing the idea.

Loomer’s visit is viewed by some as a symbolic breakthrough in shifting right-wing narratives. Steven Moore, a former Republican congressional aide who leads the Ukraine Freedom Project, highlighted Loomer’s role in counterbalancing prominent MAGA voices that have propagated pro-Russian views. Moore pointed to Ukraine’s effective drone campaign and battlefield successes as evidence of Russia’s setbacks, noting that Trump’s affinity for “winners” could influence his stance.

The Ukrainian visit also included meetings with religious leaders such as Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman, whose son was killed fighting Russian forces, providing a personal rebuttal to claims about neo-Nazi affiliations. Loomer, who is Jewish, used the encounter to counter misinformation and reframe U.S. support for Ukraine as a strategic investment in American security, citing Ukraine’s counter-drone technology’s utility in Middle Eastern defense against Iranian threats.

Observers note that Loomer’s messaging may offer a way to present Ukrainian aid in terms that resonate with Trump’s base, emphasizing patriotism, security, and military effectiveness rather than charity. Former Fox News aide Joe Lindesly suggested that this approach could help Trump articulate a pro-Ukraine position politically acceptable to his supporters.

As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches its fifth year, the interplay between U.S. domestic political divisions—particularly within the conservative right—and foreign policy towards Ukraine continues to evolve, with figures like Loomer playing a potentially influential yet controversial role.