United Nations experts have recommended that Britain and other former slave-trading nations should erect statues and monuments honouring people of African descent as part of efforts to address the legacy of the transatlantic slave trade. This guidance was outlined in a recent report prepared by legal advisers to the UN Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), following a resolution passed by UN member states in March calling for reparations linked to slavery.

The report emphasizes that these countries have both a moral and legal responsibility to repair the harm caused by slavery. Measures proposed include the installation of public artworks and monuments in recognition of the contributions of African descendants, reforms in educational curricula, enforcement of hate speech laws, and efforts to combat xenophobia toward migrants and other vulnerable groups. Additionally, the committee encourages political leaders to educate the public about the importance of reparatory justice for fostering inclusive societies. The proposals align with sentiments raised during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, which saw the removal of statues associated with slave traders, such as that of Edward Colston in Bristol.

However, the recommendations have sparked debate among historians and commentators. Professor Lawrence Goldman, emeritus fellow at St. Peter’s College, Oxford, described the UN’s call as "ironic," noting Britain’s historical role in the abolition movement and its leadership in ending slavery during the Victorian era, long before the establishment of the United Nations. He argued that contemporary slavery remains a pressing issue and suggested that efforts should focus on addressing modern forms of slavery rather than revisiting historical grievances.

Similarly, Cambridge historian Robert Tombs raised concerns about the initiative, cautioning against one-sided narratives. He acknowledged the importance of accurate historical accounts and recognition of those who suffered, but warned that reparatory justice campaigns risk oversimplifying history and suppressing free discussion. Tombs highlighted complexities such as the involvement of both white and black slave traders and pointed out that Britain compensated some black slave owners during abolition, a fact rarely mentioned in public debate. He also questioned the sincerity of some reparations demands, suggesting they may be motivated by financial and political interests.

The issue is expected to come under further scrutiny in the United Kingdom, particularly ahead of the King’s forthcoming tour of the Caribbean, where questions regarding royal connections to the slave trade are anticipated. Meanwhile, the African Union is reportedly developing a legal case to press Britain for reparations at the international level.

The debate reflects ongoing tensions over how nations reckon with the historical impact of slavery and how best to address its enduring legacies in society today.