For the second consecutive year, the United States has denied entry visas to the Palestinian delegation, including President Mahmoud Abbas, preventing them from attending the United Nations General Assembly’s high-level meetings in New York. In response, the General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to allow Abbas and other senior Palestinian officials to participate remotely via pre-recorded video statements, circumventing the U.S. restrictions.
The decision, passed with a vote of 152 in favor, three against, and four abstentions, came after the U.S. State Department criticized the Palestinian leadership for seeking unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state through international bodies rather than through direct negotiations with Israel. The United States, along with Israel and Paraguay, opposed the resolution; Colombia, Honduras, Panama, and Peru abstained.
This latest visa denial echoes a precedent set in 1988 when then-Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat was refused a U.S. visa to address the UN. At that time, the General Assembly temporarily relocated to Geneva to provide a platform for Arafat, marking a rare departure from the UN headquarters in New York. Although the Palestinian delegation is now barred from physically attending, advances in communication technology have allowed remote participation, a compromise accepted by the UN amid concerns about relocation costs and environmental impact.
The situation has drawn criticism from experts and officials. Dr. Stephen Zunes, a politics professor and Middle Eastern studies coordinator at the University of San Francisco, highlighted that under the 1947 Headquarters Agreement between the United States and the UN, the U.S. is obliged to grant visas to foreign leaders attending the General Assembly. He noted that previous U.S. administrations permitted visits by various controversial leaders, including Muammar Gaddafi and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Zunes characterized the current policy toward the Palestinian leadership as an act of discrimination rather than a response to governance or legal violations, pointing out that the Palestinian Authority recognizes Israel, renounces terrorism, and advocates for peace.
Mouin Rabbani, managing editor of the independent publication Jadaliyya, condemned the U.S. for disregarding its international obligations as the host country of the UN. He described the U.S. government's refusal to issue visas as a violation carried out under dubious pretexts and accused it of acting as an enforcer for Israel’s interests. Rabbani argued that this behavior undermines the credibility of the United States as host nation and suggested that the Palestinians might push for the General Assembly’s session to be held outside the U.S., though he expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of the current Palestinian leadership’s response.
Separately, UN Secretary-General António Guterres has expressed deep regret over the U.S. decision, emphasizing the importance of full participation by all member states for the proper functioning of the organization. UN spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric confirmed that the Secretary-General continues to engage with U.S. authorities to ensure compliance with the Headquarters Agreement and to facilitate visa issuance for all delegations.
As the General Assembly’s eighty-first session continues through September 28, it is expected to hear from approximately 73 heads of state, 45 heads of government, nine ministers, 11 vice presidents, and one crown prince, with the Palestinian leadership participating remotely due to ongoing visa restrictions.
