The narratives surrounding wars often emphasize the intentions and actions of political and military leaders, while the experiences of the ordinary individuals who endure the consequences tend to be marginalized. Terry Deary, author of the “Horrible Histories” series, argues that a deeper understanding of war requires centering the stories of those who suffer its impact rather than glorifying the deeds of those who initiate conflict.

Deary highlights how historical accounts frequently portray wars through the perspectives of commanders and rulers, who justify military actions as defensive or necessary, even when motivated by power or personal gain. He cites Julius Caesar’s campaigns in Gaul as an example: Caesar claimed his invasion was a response to a migrating Gallic tribe threatening Rome’s allies, framing the conflict as a preemptive defense. However, the war resulted in massive loss of life, enslavement, and substantial profit for Caesar himself. While Caesar chronicled his military exploits to enhance his reputation, the voices of the Gallic people and even the Roman soldiers who suffered hardship remain largely absent from historical records.

Deary draws parallels to contemporary conflicts, noting that similar patterns of justification and propaganda persist. Leaders often portray their causes as righteous, urging populations to support wars that may ultimately serve political ambitions or economic interests more than genuine security concerns. The perspective of civilians living through conflict—displaced families, injured children, and devastated communities—is rarely given equivalent prominence in official narratives.

The recent Israeli strike on a residential block in the Al-Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City underscores the human toll behind headlines of military operations. Images from October 9, 2026, depict children affected by the attack, illustrating the direct impact of hostilities on vulnerable populations. Such scenes serve as a reminder that wars are not abstract events decided by distant leaders; they are lived tragedies for countless individuals caught in the crossfire.

Deary calls for a shift in educational approaches that extend beyond traditional military histories focused on battles and treaties. He advocates teaching war through personal stories of those impacted, fostering empathy and a more nuanced understanding of the devastating consequences of conflict. By recognizing the suffering of civilians and rank-and-file soldiers alike, societies might develop greater impetus toward preventing future wars.

This broader view challenges long-standing narratives shaped by those in power, encouraging a critical examination of why wars begin and whom they truly affect. As history often repeats the mistakes of the past, listening to the voices of those who endure war’s brutality could be key to breaking cycles of violence and advancing peace.