The independent horror film "Obsession" has become a remarkable example of Gen Z’s influence at the box office, grossing $300 million worldwide on a modest budget of $750,000. Directed and written by 26-year-old Curry Barker, the film stands as Focus Features' biggest hit to date and has also been financially beneficial for executive producer Jason Blum. Additionally, the film's success has provided a boost to movie theaters, which typically receive about half of the ticket revenue. However, questions have emerged regarding how the financial gains from such breakout hits are distributed, particularly among lower-paid crew members.
Sally Choi, the film’s art director, publicly shared details of her compensation for roughly three weeks of work, revealing a post-tax paycheck of $6,741.36. Choi acknowledged accepting the pay but described living paycheck to paycheck while handling multiple responsibilities common in low-budget productions. She also cited the "physical toll" the work took on her health, stating that crew members like herself often become merely "a line in the budget sheet to keep as low as possible."
Requests for comment from Blumhouse Productions, Curry Barker, and Focus Features representatives were not returned. This situation revives longstanding debates within the entertainment industry over profit-sharing. Historically, after major successes such as the Broadway hit "Hamilton," cast and creative teams have secured a share of profits. The indie horror genre has previous examples: the 1999 film "The Blair Witch Project," made on a budget of about $60,000, generated nearly $250 million globally. Its directors, Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez, acknowledged feeling compelled to share profits with creative contributors and production staff, although financial settlements with studios could be complicated and contentious.
While some argue that crew members like Choi should not expect additional earnings simply because a film becomes successful, citing the financial risks borne largely by producers and investors, others emphasize the risks taken by crew who frequently accept below-market wages to support productions. Zack Larez, a storyboard artist and co-chair of the Young Artists Committee of the Art Directors Guild, highlighted that by accepting low pay, crew members effectively subsidize the lowered financial risk for investors.
Alternative models are emerging to address these concerns. The 2024 drama "Sing Sing" implemented a pay structure granting cast and crew equity stakes, with all participants, including Oscar nominee Colman Domingo, receiving equal pay. Similarly, actress and producer Zendaya employed a profit-sharing approach for her 2021 film "Malcolm & Marie."
Industry professionals like producer and Columbia University film professor Mynette Louie acknowledge that pressures to minimize budgets contribute to productions relocating outside of Los Angeles and the United States to avoid union pay scales. Louie advocates for collaboration between studios and unions to develop frameworks that support low-budget filmmakers while promoting fairer compensation for all production team members. She praised Choi’s public recognition of the disparity between a daily wage of roughly $300 and the film’s extraordinary financial success, calling the situation objectively unfair.
The debate surrounding profit distribution in independent filmmaking reflects broader challenges in balancing artistic ambition, financial risk, and equitable compensation as more small productions achieve unexpected commercial success.
