Andy Burnham is preparing to form his cabinet ahead of becoming Prime Minister on July 20, following his decisive victory over a sitting PM. As he shapes his administration’s priorities, speculation is growing about potential appointments, with particular attention on the Miliband brothers—David and Ed.
Insiders close to Burnham indicate that David Miliband, a former Foreign Secretary, is a strong contender to return to the Foreign Office. Sources suggest Burnham values David’s expertise in geopolitics and his nuanced understanding of international crises, areas where Burnham himself lacks deep experience. David’s leadership role at the International Rescue Committee and his extensive global network reportedly make him an appealing choice to handle foreign affairs, allowing Burnham to focus on domestic issues.
However, appointing David carries risks. The former minister has expressed skepticism about former U.S. President Donald Trump, whom he reportedly views as a threat. His critical stance on the Iran war could complicate relations with the United States, especially given the delicate balance Burnham must maintain within NATO and the ongoing Ukraine conflict. Burnham’s cautious comments on Trump so far highlight a pragmatic approach to transatlantic relations. Maintaining the cooperation of the “E3” group—comprising the UK, Germany, and France—has been a notable achievement under the current leadership, and Burnham is expected to continue this policy.
The dynamic between the Miliband brothers adds another layer of complexity. Ed Miliband, currently Energy Secretary and a figure popular on the Labour left, is widely considered a top candidate for Chancellor, given his economic experience dating back to his advisory role under Gordon Brown and his reputation for policy clarity. Yet Ed and David have a longstanding political rivalry dating back to Ed’s challenge to David for the Labour leadership in 2010. While their personal relationship remains distant, recent joint family announcements suggest some personal boundaries remain respected.
Appointing both brothers to prominent roles would be unusual and may provoke debate about concentration of power within one family. Moreover, Ed faces criticism from parts of the business community, with some entrepreneurs fearing his policies could hinder economic growth, viewing him as less business-friendly than current Chancellor Rachel Reeves. Conversely, supporters praise Ed’s focused approach and determination in pushing policies forward.
Burnham’s eventual cabinet is expected to be sizeable, reflecting various tiers of influence and proximity to the prime minister. Final selections will inevitably leave some candidates disappointed, with lingering tensions likely among those excluded. As Burnham prepares to lead a new government, balancing expertise, political alliances, and public perception remains a formidable challenge.
