Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have faced scrutiny over their approach to their children’s education, particularly regarding the choice not to homeschool. Critics have questioned whether homeschooling could reduce the couple’s security risks and their reliance on taxpayer-funded protection.

The debate gained attention amid discussions about the Sussexes’ security arrangements, which include protective convoys during school runs. Some observers argue that opting for home tutoring, a practice historically favored by members of the British royal family—including the late Queen Elizabeth II’s father—might mitigate these concerns.

One commentator suggested that homeschooling could alleviate the need for extensive security measures linked to public school commutes. By providing education at home, the couple could potentially minimize exposure to public environments that necessitate costly protective details.

Supporters of homeschooling point to the benefit of a controlled environment that enhances safety and privacy for children, especially given the heightened public interest and media attention surrounding the Sussex family. However, the couple has so far chosen to enroll their children in traditional schools, which has prompted ongoing debate about balancing privacy, security, and education preferences.

Representatives for Harry and Meghan have not publicly addressed these specific criticisms. The broader issue reflects the challenges faced by high-profile families in managing security alongside efforts to maintain a sense of normalcy for their children.