Erika Kirk, widow of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, appeared in court Monday for the first day of a preliminary hearing against Tyler Robinson, the 23-year-old accused of fatally shooting her husband last September. The hearing, held at the Fourth District Courthouse in Provo, Utah, will last a week as prosecutors seek to establish sufficient evidence to proceed to trial, where Robinson could face the death penalty on charges of aggravated murder.

The shooting occurred at Utah Valley University during a rally at which Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA and a prominent Donald Trump ally, was speaking. Prosecutors showed graphic videos capturing the moments before and after the shooting, including the fatal gunshot and emergency first aid rendered at the scene. One video showed the bullet striking Kirk in the neck from a rooftop vantage point. Robinson reportedly left a note for his roommate and romantic partner stating, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it,” which prosecutors cited as a confession.

During the hearing, Erika Kirk became visibly emotional, breaking down in tears and leaving the courtroom twice while facing Robinson. She was accompanied by her mother-in-law Kathryn Kirk, as well as other family members, including Charlie Kirk’s parents. High-profile figures such as Donald Trump Jr. and far-right commentator Jack Posobiec attended the hearing to support the Kirk family. Erika Kirk described her late husband as “beloved” and acknowledged the court proceedings as a painful reminder of their loss, which has deeply affected their children.

Robinson, who appeared in court wearing a grey suit and shackled wrists, remained composed and took notes while communicating with his attorney. According to investigators, Robinson was raised in a Mormon family with Republican values but allegedly committed the shooting due to intolerance of what he viewed as hateful rhetoric promoted by Kirk. Robinson has not yet entered a formal plea.

The preliminary hearing will determine whether the case advances to a full trial, with prosecutors seeking the maximum penalty. The proceedings continue as both sides present evidence and testimony in the high-profile case that has drawn national attention for its political and social implications.