Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District candidates, Republican Representative Tom Tiffany and Democratic Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley, engaged in a televised debate on Wednesday, addressing key issues including taxes, abortion, marijuana legalization, and economic development. The event, held at Marquette University in Milwaukee and broadcast by a local news outlet, marked the candidates’ only scheduled head-to-head faceoff before the November election.

Wisconsin’s statewide elections frequently hinge on narrow margins, elevating the significance of the debate as an opportunity for Crowley to introduce himself broadly to voters and for Tiffany to appeal to independents wary of his close association with former President Donald Trump. Polling suggests the race remains tightly contested, with Democrats aiming to retain the governor’s office and potentially seize control of both chambers of the state legislature from Republicans.

Early in the debate, Tiffany, a staunch conservative backed by Trump, avoided directly addressing concerns about his alignment with the former president. Instead, he emphasized his commitment to Wisconsin and shared a personal anecdote, making no explicit reference to Trump’s influence. Crowley frequently cited Tiffany’s connection to the Trump agenda, attributing to it policies including tariffs, ongoing military engagements, and rising fuel prices.

Regarding economic development, the candidates expressed conditional support for expanding data centers in Wisconsin. Tiffany advocated for growth without additional state subsidies, utility rate increases, and insisted on local community involvement in decisions, while opposing construction on farmland. Crowley favored a temporary halt to assess potential environmental impacts before proceeding with further data center projects.

Both contenders expressed support for marijuana legalization, with some differences. Tiffany supported legalizing medical marijuana, while Crowley endorsed full recreational legalization. Crowley highlighted the economic benefits, referencing Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker’s recent remarks about Wisconsin residents contributing $30 million in tax revenue through cross-border purchases of cannabis products.

On abortion rights, Crowley positioned himself as a defender of access, contrasting with Tiffany’s co-sponsorship of federal legislation seeking to ban abortion after approximately six weeks. When questioned about signing a law to provide unrestricted abortion access, Crowley deferred, stating such decisions should be made between patients and healthcare providers. Tiffany, responding to a hypothetical ban based on fetal cardiac activity detection, said he would not endorse such a measure, acknowledging the complexity of the issue.

The debate featured exchanges over the influence of wealthy individuals, with Crowley accusing Tiffany of advancing the interests of billionaires in Washington. Tiffany dismissed these criticisms as misrepresentations and pointed to Crowley’s alignment with progressive Democrats, suggesting similarities to his primary opponent Francesca Hong, a self-identified democratic socialist.

Despite repeated moderator inquiries, both candidates stopped short of detailing specific tax plans or budget strategies to address affordability challenges facing Wisconsin families. As Election Day approaches, the debate underscored the sharply contrasting visions offered by Tiffany and Crowley on issues central to the campaign.